Even with the democrats being wholly obsessed with delegitimizing the presidency of Donald Trump, there is no shortage of incriminating acts being discovered within democratic circles.
One of the most powerful tools of the democrats in the 2016 election has been the reliance of millennial voters on the so-called “new media”, dominated by Twitter, Facebook, and Google. Given the age and lack of excitement over the nomination of Hillary Clinton during the primaries, it was important for these doomed dems to wholly control the narrative on these popular platforms, no matter the ethical impact of their collusion.
Of course, as with all things leftist, it was only a matter of time before their wealth of corruption came bubbling to the surface. Thanks to the whistleblowers at Wikileaks, evidence of collusion between the Clinton campaign and Facebook wasn’t hard to come by.
“Mark Zuckerberg’s claims this week that Facebook was fair to Donald Trump during the 2016 election just took another serious blow.
“The Facebook founder and CEO personally met with Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta a year before the 2016 election, according to an email released by Wikileaks.
“The news comes a day after Wikileaks’ Julian Assange dropped a bomb onto the heads of Zuckerberg and Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg, alleging they colluded with Hillary Clinton’s 2016 election campaign.
“Assange Tweeted Thursday, linking the emails sent back and forth between John Podesta and Sandberg which reveal Sandberg wanted Clinton to win ‘badly.’ Assange said the women met privately numerous times during Clinton’s campaign.
“Assange included one email from Sandberg to Podesta, Clinton’s campaign manager, which is particularly damaging in which the Facebook executive pledged to help elect Clinton.
“Now comes a newer revelation from Assange which clearly shows Podesta met privately with Zuckerberg on at least one occasion leading up to the 2016 presidential election.”
Facebook’s influence in the millennial world has come under fire in recent months, as an increasing amount of young people turn to the biased platform as a political resource.
Unfortunately, Mark Zuckerberg’s insistence on culling conservative views from his social media empire has led to a number of criticisms about the reality that Facebook reflects. In all truth, Facebook is noting more than a soapbox for Zuckerberg’s own ideals, and, apparently, Hillary’s as well.
There is mounting pressure for government oversight of resources such as Google and Facebook by free speech advocates.