Watchdog Files Ethics Complaint Against Democrat Leader

Earlier today, the fantastic folks at Freedom Watch and their leader, Larry Klayman, announced that they were filing an ethics complaint against Democrat leader and Adam Schiff (D-CA).

Schiff is the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee and he has been one of the loudest congressional voices implying that President Trump colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election. You might remember, a couple of weeks ago, when Schiff told the media that the FBI had “proof” of Trump-Russia crimes? Schiff quickly backtracked and said that he hadn’t seen any such evidence, but that he believed it existed. In the real world we call that kind of thing a “smear tactic.” You do something like that when you want to ruin someone else’s reputation but you don’t want to get sued for slander or libel. Well, the media might have given Schiff a pass for his sinful politicization of an investigation that he’s supposed to be running in a nonpartisan manner (to get justice and all) but Freedom Watch will try to hold him accountable.

Trending: Trump Takes Away Congress’ Annual Ribeye ‘Picnic’, Sends Steaks To…

Here’s the letter that Freedom Watch sent to Rep. Susan Brooks, the chairwoman of the Ethics Committee.

Klayman called Schiff a “hack” who cares more about power and party than he does the safety and security of his country.

He said much the same thing on Newsmax TV:

Onan Coca

Onan is the Editor-in-Chief at Romulus Marketing. He's also the managing editor at, and the managing partner at Onan is a graduate of Liberty University (2003) and earned his M.Ed. at Western Governors University in 2012. Onan lives in Atlanta with his wife and their three wonderful children. You can find his writing all over the web.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.