Just when the storms and protests caused by Hillary Clinton losing the presidential election to Donald Trump were beginning to calm down, Jill Stein of the Green Party, just poured more gasoline on the fires to get them burning again.
Stein has raised nearly $6 million to pay for election recounts in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan. She has already filed the motion for a recount for a recount in Wisconsin, filed the motion yesterday in Pennsylvania and will file the motion in Michigan on Wednesday.
Stein says her wanting a recount has nothing to do with wanting Hillary Clinton declared the winner, but has everything to do with making sure the elections were accurate and that there wasn’t any hacking that could have skewed the election results. Yet, with Stein receiving such a small percentage of the vote, it seems obvious that her motive is try to get a woman – Hillary Clinton – in the White House as President.
Over the weekend, attorneys for Hillary Clinton’s campaign announced that they will also participate in the recounts to help verify their accuracy. Evidently, Hillary’s concession to Donald Trump is not acceptable to them and they continue to fight to get her into the White House.
In response to the news about the recounts, Donald Trump tweeted that he actually won the popular vote, not Hillary, due to millions of people voting illegally. The liberal media instantly began attacking Trump for his tweet and saying that there is no evidence to support his claim of voter fraud.
However, as previously reported:
“Getting back to this year’s election, per most sources, Clinton won the popular vote 62,020,451 to Trump’s 60,963,480 for a difference of slightly more than 1 million and it needs to be noted that there are still ballots being counted.”
“But did Hillary really win the popular vote? NO, I don’t think she did.”
“On November 11, Gregg Phillips, Founder of VoteStand and JumpVote, posted:”
“’Completed analysis of database of 180 million voter registrations.’”
“’Number of non-citizen votes exceeds 3 million.’”
“’Consulting legal team.’”
On November 13, Phillips posted again, saying:
“We have verified more than three million votes cast by non-citizens. “
“We are joining .@TrueTheVote to initiate legal action. “
Infowars picked up on Phillip’s posts and responded with:
“According to current indications, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by around 630,000 votes, although around 7 million ballots remain uncounted.”
“Virtually all of the votes cast by 3 million illegal immigrants are likely to have been for Hillary Clinton, meaning Trump might have won the popular vote when this number is taken into account.”
“Vote fraud using ballots cast in the name of dead people and illegal alien voters was a huge concern before the election.”
“On the morning of the election there were 4 million dead people on U.S. voter rolls.”
If Phillips’ claim is accurate, then Donald John Trump actually won the popular vote by more than 1 million votes. I also wonder how many liberal Democrats voted in more than one state like they did in 2012? If there was a way to nullify all of the votes of dead people, convicted felons, illegal aliens, non-citizens and all those who cast more than one vote, I’m certain that Trump would have won the popular vote by more than 1-3 million votes over Hillary Clinton.
If the liberal media made this information known to the general public, it should put to rest much of the controversy about Trump’s election and the Electoral College. However, if the liberal media did report the truth for a change, it would go against everything they stand for and undermine their history of yellow, untrue and caustic journalistic practices.