Find Out Why The TSA Now Says To Arrive THREE Hours Before Your Flight [VIDEO]

Officials with the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) announced recently that travelers need to arrive at the airport a full three hours before their flight in order to get through the long security lines. While TSA is blaming the long wait times on an increase in travelers, experts in the field think it’s a mixture of the TSA being devious and inept.

According to aviation expert Robert Mark, it’s possible that this is the TSA’s way of convincing Congress to give them more money. Apparently, their $7 billion annual budget isn’t quite enough.

[Read Related Article: This Viral Video Shows Why the TSA Needs to Go (VIDEO)]

The media is coming to the aid of the TSA, saying that the long wait times are the result of “budget cuts.” But as an editorial in the Investor’s Business Daily pointed out, that’s always the excuse when a government agency fails. Besides, “At $7.3 billion this year, TSA’s budget is 9% higher than it was in 2007,” and “its full-time workforce climbed by 4.3% over those years.” The editorial added that “TSA’s gains since 2007 came at a time of declining air travel…. Plus, the TSA has fewer airports to manage than it once did,” since 22 airports have “opted out” of using the TSA and have implemented privately run security instead.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Jim Acosta have gotten his press pass back?

  • Should Jim Acosta have gotten his press pass back?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Watch Obama Trash the USA 18 Different Times During His Recent Trip Abroad

Chris Edwards – the director of tax policy studies with the Cato Institute – said that the agency is littered with problems that have nothing to do with “budget cuts.” One problem he mentioned is their high turnover rate, which he said is not only bad for employee morale, but also bad for security.

[Read Related Article: This Government Agency Ranked as One of the Worst Places to Work]

In addition to that, the TSA is the stereotypical government agency pouring billions of dollars into things that don’t work. “As a result,” he said, “they’ve starved their budget from hiring more screeners to reduce congestion.” One such example of the TSA dumping money into something that doesn’t work is the agency’s use of the full body scanners that were eventually discontinued because of civil liberties concerns. But even on a purely pragmatic level, the machines didn’t do anything to keep people safe. They did, however, provide something that screeners could joke about behind closed doors. Perhaps that helped with morale a bit.

CBS News travel editor Peter Greenberg doesn’t see the TSA intentionally creating chaos as an underhanded way to extract more taxpayer money. He said that they’re just inept. CBS reported:

“TSA is not adjusting to basic airline schedules and peak passenger flow times,” he said.

Greenberg points out the busiest flight times are between 7 a.m. and 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. to 7 p.m., but TSA does not concentrate enough staff during those peak times.

[Read Related Article: UNBELIEVABLE: This is How the TSA Handled Their 73 Employees on the Terrorist Watch List]

Others see these long wait times at the airport as the TSA’s way of extorting getting people to sign up for PreCheck, which costs travelers $85, and gets people through security much more quickly. There might be something to that, since about 8,300 people per day have been signing up for PreCheck, apparently double what it was last year. That’s over $700,000 per day that the TSA’s raking in.

Here’s Ben Swann’s “Reality Check” on airports’ long wait times:

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.