It is classic Clinton to blame Russia for Wikileak’s email disclosures when they have no evidence and it is much more likely that someone, if not several, of their own people are leaking these emails out of conscience, anger, envy or disappointment with the party hierarchy. It is quite ordinary for criminal enterprises to have disaffected people in them. There are many ways they can ventilate anger, angst, frustration, disappointment and disgust with their hierarchy. Stories of Hillary’s rages, rants and right crosses abound and overflow. She is an angry, violent woman with a strong throwing arm. Hillary is “lamp capable.”
The Clinton campaign should ask and listen to the people who know about computers and hacking. Stealing emails leaves no trace. It is like watching trucks or trains go by. You can read what is written on them without anyone knowing. As with books and papers, reading leaves no trace. Tracing hackers is possible only when they plant a forwarding program in your machine. Computer “virus” and “worm” programs can be as anonymous as a fart in church. But, these programs are written in any one of several systems, or “languages” that may give or plant a clue of the source. That is the only way the source can be identified in any case. Just reading a computer message leaves no trace any more than your reading a newspaper, magazine or book changes them.
A telling fact in all of this is that no media person has ever challenged Hillary on this issue, and many in the media know enough about computers, or are associated with those that do, to know that the Russian accusation is one without substance.
It would be far more logical that Russia would prefer to see Hillary as President, knowing she is incompetent, corrupt and probably not well, perhaps terminally. If she only continues the policies of the Obama Administration “…leading from behind” they will be well off and take a few more countries knowing she will do nothing. That she voted for the Iraq invasion was much more a “go along” decision than one arrived at by logic, considering facts or anger. Hillary is not for war. Hillary is for Hillary.
While the circumstance of electing our first “black” President contributed to the Obama election, that the major media made no attempt to discover why all his school records, from kindergarten on through law school, were sealed, the authorship of his books, his association with Chicago criminal elements, his false Social Security number, his counterfeit birth certificate, check the story of his Kenyan birth and why he published that he was born in Kenya, or declared he is a Muslim on YOUTUBE are facts that indict the major media in a way that puts them in violation of their Constitutionally required duty to seek and publish the truth to keep America free. All they are able to do is parrot a false accusation that “Russia did it.”