Susan Rice’s Lame Attempt to Call “Sexism”, “Racism” on Probe Backfires

As if the steady stream of excuses being spewed forth from the left weren’t already enough, Susan Rice has joined the fray, calling on the tenets of “social justice” to save her from a mess of her own doing.

Susan Rice, while working for the Obama administration, took a treasonous path to “resist” President Trump as he prepared to decimate Hillary Clinton in the general election of 2016.  As the businessman-turned-politican was putting together his all-important transition team, Susan Rice illegally and immorally worked to “unmask” those individuals, giving democratic candidate Hillary Clinton preemptive ammunition to sabotage Trump’s picks.  The move, which has been lambasted as one of the slimiest in modern political chicanery, has finally become the subject of an impeding investigation.

Trending: Beto O’Rourke Just Sunk His Campaign with TWO WORDS

Rice, however, has been arrogantly indignant in the face of these criticisms, and is now attempting to play both the “sexist” and “racist” card in the case of the long-overdue probe.

“Susan Rice, the Obama national security adviser under fire over her alleged involvement in the ‘unmasking’ of Trump associates during the 2016 presidential election, suggested in a fresh interview that race and gender might be playing a role in the scrutiny she’s faced.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“In an interview with journalist Michael Tomasky for New York Magazine, Rice reportedly questioned the criticism she’s faced dating back to the Benghazi controversy.

“’Why me? Why not Jay Carney, for example, who was then our press secretary, who stood up more?’ she asked.

“Tomasky noted in the piece that Carney “isn’t an African-American woman, of course” and apparently asked Rice whether that is the key factor. Rice, in response, left the door open:

“’I don’t know… I do not leap to the simple explanation that it’s only about race and gender. I’m trying to keep my theories to myself until I’m ready to come out with them. It’s not because I don’t have any.’”

Race and gender are, of course, two of the most often employed weapons in the liberal arsenal, as it pertains to tainting the character of someone they disagree with.

By working for decades to install rigid and totalitarian standards for political correctness in the United States, the left is now about to demonize anyone, any thing, or any situation by employing these “ist” terms.  If they don’t like President Trump’s immigration plan, he’s racist.  If conservatives turn their back on sellout Megyn Kelly, they are sexist.  It is literally a war of semantics and political correctness gone horribly awry.

Susan Rice’s crimes have nothing to do with the color of her skin or what gender she identifies as.  Justice in America is blind.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.