One of the most glaring evidences of Clinton corruption that has been revealed by the WikiLeaks releases had to do with a $12 MILLION “donation” that the nation of Morocco “gave” to the Clinton Foundation. The leaked emails detailed that the donation was not so much a “gift” but a pay-for-play bribe from the Moroccan King to the Clinton family.
In worried emails, Hillary Clinton’s closest cronies discussed how to handle the situation because they knew that the donation was contingent upon certain promises made by Mrs. Clinton herself.
“Just to give you some context, the condition upon which the Moroccans agreed to host the meeting was her participation. If hrc was not part if it, meeting was a non-starter. CGI also wasn’t pushing for a meeting in Morocco and it wasn’t their first choice. This was HRC’s idea, our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing this at her request. The King has personally committed approx $12 million both for the endowment and to support the meeting. It will break a lot of china to back out now when we had so many opportunities to do it in the past few months. She created this mess and she knows it,” Huma Abedin told Clinton team leaders John Podesta and Robby Mook in one of the leaked emails.
Trending: Science is Settled
Yes, in exchange for $12 MILLION, Hillary Clinton had promised to hold a high-profile Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) event in Morocco in 2015. She promised to attend, and the Moroccan leader needed a private conversation with the Clintons.
However, the timing of the event couldn’t have been worse.
The CGI conference was scheduled to take place just two months after Hillary Clinton had announced her candidacy for President, and her team knew it would look bad for her to be travelling to Morocco to deliver a speech in return for donations. However, they also knew that the Clintons wanted to keep the $12 MILLION donation and so they scrambled to find a solution.
All of this is detailed in the emails, and it proves that the Clinton Foundation was being used to launder money for the Clinton family’s corruption.
Now questions are also being asked about the Clinton Foundation’s ties to Sweden.
The Clinton Foundation raised $26 million from Sweden while the Swedish government was lobbying the State Department to not sanction Swedish businesses working with Iran.
In 2009, diplomatic officials warned that Sweden was ramping up trade with Iran, even while the U.S. was placing heavy sanctions on Iran in an attempt to drive them to the bargaining table and halt their nuclear program…
In November 2011, a few weeks after the State Department released the first Iran sanctions list that did not include Ericsson or any other Swedish companies, Bill Clinton received $750,000 for a speech he gave to Ericsson.
The State Department ultimately chose not to sanction any Swedish companies.
Clinton’s campaign manager, Robby Mook, pointed out all of these problems months before his emails leaked to the public, and still the Clinton team chose to do nothing… nothing but try to cover up the obviously bad behavior.
In an email with the subject line “Foundation vulnerability points,” Mook outlined areas where the foundation’s work could potentially cause a problem for the campaign.
The list includes: “Money from foreign governments,” “Overseas events with foreign leaders or government officials” and “Potential conflicts from overseas-owned organizations (UK and Sweeden) (sic).”
In another email released Tuesday by Wikileaks, Mook wrote: “We really need to shut Morocco and these paid speeches down.”
After a series of contentious back and forths between Abedin, Podesta and Mook, the decision was made to have Bill and Chelsea Clinton attended the Morocco conference in Hillary’s stead.
On Tuesday, reporters concerned with the implications from the most recently leaked emails asked State Department spokesman John Kirby if Morocco (and others) received special treatment from the State Department after donating the large sums of cash to the Clinton Foundation. Kirby was less than forthcoming in his response:
“I can’t speak for every decision made during that time frame. And I’m not going to speak to the veracity of these documents.”
Um. So that’s not a no? It’s astonishing to see the State Department get asked, point blank, if there was corruption and then hear them respond with a definitive… maybe. Astonishing, and infuriating.
Donald Trump’s campaign has already jumped on the new evidence of Clinton corruption and created this neat little graphic for everyone to share with their friends.
— Official Team Trump (@TeamTrump) October 21, 2016
This is no “right-wing conspiracy” folks. You can read the evidence for yourself in black and white thanks to the WikiLeaks releases. Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, the Clinton Global Initiative, the State Department, the Justice Department, and the Obama administration are all tied together in this massive web of corruption, and there is simply no way for them to explain all of the evidence that is now a matter of public record. Hillary Clinton is the personification of corruption; she is the textbook definition of unethical, and she is most certainly “crooked.”