There can no longer be any question about what American Leftists really want. Vox hailed the socialist magazine, Jacobin, ‘Reason in Revolt,’ as “the leading intellectual voice of the American Left, the most vibrant and relevant socialist publication in a very long time,” has published an article that says in no uncertain terms that the Constitution should be “burned.”
CNS News reported:
Ackerman’s article argues that the Constitution, with its governmental checks and balances, prevents “the democratic will” and “popular sovereignty.” Ackerman criticizes both conservatives and liberals for what he calls “Constitution fetish.”
CNS News printed several excerpts, including:
It stands to reason that a document drafted by a coterie of gilded gentry, openly contemptuous of “democracy” and panicked by what they saw as the mob rule of the 1780s, would seek to constrict popular sovereignty to the point of strangulation. Thus, brilliantly and subtly, the system they built rendered it virtually impossible for the electorate to obtain a concerted change in national policy by a collective act of political will. The Senate is an undemocratic monstrosity in which 84 percent of the population can be outvoted by the 16 percent living in the smallest states. The passage of legislation requires the simultaneous assent of three separate entities — the presidency, House, and Senate — that voters are purposely denied the opportunity to choose at one time, with two-thirds of the Senate membership left in place after each election. The illogical electoral college gears the whole combat of presidential elections around a few, almost randomly determined, swing states that happen to contain evenly balanced numbers of Democrats and Republicans. And the entire system is frozen in amber by an amendment process of almost comical complexity…
What is equally lamentable is that the recent rise (or, rather, return) to prominence of this constitutional crankery has spawned a whole genre of anxious liberal commentary aimed at rescuing the document’s honor from the clutches of uncouth reactionaries. It is an article of faith in this commentary that the Glenn Beck crowd simply misunderstand the Constitution and the intentions of the Founders. They labor under the illusion that our founding text enshrines conservative principles, when in reality (the claim goes) it’s an ambiguous document whose meaning is contested and always changing — or maybe even a warrant for ceaseless progress and change. But whatever it is, the Constitution according to today’s liberals is always misunderstood and never at fault, usually treated with a fond if wised-up reverence and never with the disapproving righteousness of the more advanced progressives…
It is a measure of our current ideological morass that liberals, in their own enlightened and open-minded way, still masochistically embrace a throne-and-altar orthodoxy that subordinates the people’s will to a virtually unalterable diktat handed down by an ancient council of aristocratic, semi-deified lawgivers.
In essence, the Left — which has always held the Constitution in contempt, except when it can be used to advance their goals, wants to do away with the document altogether.
A “Jacobin,” according to Moonbattery, is “a member of a radical society or club of revolutionaries that promoted the Reign of Terror and other extreme measures, active chiefly from 1789 to 1794.” This definition helps clarify the Left’s mindset and agenda.
It also explains why the 2016 presidential election is so important, and it further illustrates why conservatives need to stop beating each other to death. The real enemy of freedom and the Constitution is George Soros, Hillary and Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and Sen. [score]Bernard Sanders[/score], not fellow conservatives.