Sean Hannity: The FBI Reopened the Investigation because WikiLeaks is about to Destroy Hillary Clinton

Fox News recently learned that the FBI likely had knowledge of the thousands (more than 650,000) of new Clinton emails on the Weiner/Abedin laptop. This latest realization begs the question, why now? Why is FBI Director James Comey choosing this late date to announce that the FBI has reopened the Hillary Clinton private email investigation?

Sean Hannity has an interesting theory that might actually go a long way to explaining what is going on in Washington, D.C. This past week on his radio show, Hannity argued that the reason Comey made the announcement when he did was that the FBI discovered that WikiLeaks is about to drop a BOMBSHELL on the Clinton campaign. Hannity believes that the next big WikiLeaks release will hold proof that the FBI should have indicted Hillary Clinton back in July. Here’s what he said on his show:

If you believe The New York Times, they have a new story that just broke. “New emails in Clinton case came from Anthony Weiner’s electronic devices. Federal law enforcement officials said Friday that new emails uncovered in closed investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server discovered after the FBI seized electronic devices belonging to Huma Abedin, and aide to Mrs. Clinton, and her husband Anthony Weiner. The FBI told Congress that uncovered new emails.” 

take our poll - story continues below

Should Jim Acosta have gotten his press pass back?

  • Should Jim Acosta have gotten his press pass back?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Watch Obama Trash the USA 18 Different Times During His Recent Trip Abroad

Let me tell you how. I am going to say something that I know is true. This story is total bull. I don’t believe this for a minute. “Hannity, it’s The New York Times.” I have no doubt the New York Times got on-the-record leaks that this is related to Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin’s emails. I have no doubt — maybe Huma didn’t take a sledgehammer to her devices the way Hillary Clinton did. But this is not what resulted in the reopening of this case. No way, shape, manner, or form. They know Julian Assange — there’s too much in WikiLeaks that is coming, that has tipped them off that they’re dead. That they’re about to be exposed. And that is, more than anything else, this is about preservation now.

Because James Comey, and and now we get back to… this this sky Andrew McCabe who was the FBI deputy director supervising the investigation of Clinton not long after Terry McAuliffe through a PAC gave $675,000 dollars to Jo McCabe, the wife of the chief the FBI deputy Director looking into the investigation into Clinton for a long shot bid, and that $675,000 came from Hillary, who went out there and raise money for the Super PACs that McAuliffe coudl give it to her.

The wife of the guy doing the key investigation here. Now if that doesn’t impress you, I don’t know what does..

Now let’s go back to Trey Gowdy grilling James Comey. What did he say?

Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received classified information over a private email server, is that true? “Comey: Our investigation found there was classified information sent.”

Stop right there. Comey is admitting a crime is committed. That raises the question why did Comey then make a determination on his own not to send this to or grand jury or special prosecutor or anybody else? In other words, the statute requires, she doesn’t even have to be negligent. I’m sorry the statute requires negligence or gross negligence, yet Hillary was knowingly, purposefully, and WikiLeaks proves this, in her decisions and actions setting up a server under her control.

Here’s the question Comey has to ask: Why did you give all these people immunity?Why did you destroy evidence in the case as part of a proffered deal, why in under any circumstances do you close this case down when the evidence was overwhelming and incontrovertible and had sent numerous other people to jail for a far lesser offenses? That’s called a two-tiered Justice system, that’s a problem…

Hillary knowingly and purposely hurt decisions and actions set up a server under her exclusive control and possession in order to control (violate the law) in ordered to control information that was available to the American public and Congress regarding actions as Secretary of State.

Furthermore, she took those government-owned communications into our own personal possession after leaving her position, knowingly and willingly attempted to destroy them, by the way that’s obstruction of justice, violation of the law, penalty of which a minor offenses you never get a government position for the rest of your life. And was so nefarious in her actions, could never be known used as evidence…

This gets more curious day by day. Now there were reports out today that FBI agents were reportedly close to revolting over the treatment of Clinton, they’re so disgusted, and every FBI special agent I know … nobody has a good answer because they don’t understand why organizes pretty deep

New emails tied to discovered– I don’t believe the New York Times, and I think the the FBI did this because they know what is coming. That’s my take.

Tags 🇺🇸

I am the supreme law of the United States. Originally comprising seven articles, I delineate the national frame of government. My first three articles entrench the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Articles Four, Five and Six entrench concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments and of the states in relationship to the federal government. Article Seven establishes the procedure subsequently used by the thirteen States to ratify it. I am regarded as the oldest written and codified constitution in force of the world.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.