The common phrase that is used to say why Hillary lost the election is: it’s because she didn’t campaign in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Then how does that explain the over 1000 other elections that the democrats recently lost?
The real reason that democrats lose is because people are sick of them supporting the murder of over 60 million babies. People are sick of the devolving morals that has led to the unbelievable challenge of transgenders wanting to access the bathrooms and locker rooms of the gender that they weren’t born into. People are sick of the riots in the streets over false claims regarding police brutality of criminals. People are sick of democrats kicking God out of mainstream institutions. People are sick of Antifa covering their faces, and themselves committing fascism which they are accusing others of doing. People are sick of seeing gay people holding hands and kissing. People are sick of bakers being fined for following their conscience before God (who also is sick of all the things mentioned here). People are sick of conservatives being shouted down when they try to speak at colleges. People are sick of having to pay for transgenders in the military getting the very expensive surgery to change their gender. People are sick of pornography severely hurting male/female relationships and kids growing up. In short, people are sick of democrats.
But Republicans, unlike some of those on the left, aren’t violent people. So they make their feelings known at the ballot box and at the Stock Market. And thank God for the Republicans who have the courage to point out the evil of the liberals. The “special” counsel is not finding any wrongdoing on the part of Trump and his campaign, yet there is a LOT of wrongdoing by Hillary and the democrats that could keep a special counsel busy for a long time. Why is that not happening?
It’s hard to understand the mindset of such evil and lack of intelligence of the democrats … especially because they never open up with intelligent explanations (e.g. the NFL protests). But we got a glimpse into that mentality on Tucker Carlson’s show last night into the mind of some feminists.
Last week a feminist called Emily Lindin announced on Twitter that she was, “not at all concerned about innocent men losing their jobs in the search for perpetrators of sexual harassment. If some innocent men’s reputations have to take a hit in the process of undoing the patriarchy, that is a price I’m absolutely willing to pay.”
Lindin not surprisingly is a columnist at Teen Vogue. Tucker asked her to come on his show to talk about her views, but she refused.
After he pointed that out, a feminist came on the show and said that she was fine with this crime of slander because women make better leaders and should be running the country. (And I say) and your example to accomplish this and your proof of your premise here was with a crooked politician like Hillary Clinton? (Too many crimes to list here).
So that’s the ultimate goal of many feminists. Thanks for finally letting us know.
If you want insight into the destructive psychology of liberals, go to www.ThePlagueOfLiberalism.com.