North Korea

Pundits Agree “Muscular” Trump has America Leading Again

Editorial credit: JStone /

President Trump has displayed some remarkable leadership in recent weeks, at least according to a couple of pundits from Fox News.

Journalist Chris Wallace, and conservative thinker Charles Krauthammer both explained how Trump’s recent spate of foreign policy decision in Syria, Afghanistan, Russia, and China have all provided evidence that the Obama era is behind us and the Trump era will mean that the USA is once again leading from the front.


“What, less that 100 days into office, we certainly haven’t seen this from Barack Obama, who the Trump administration openly dismisses as paralysis through analysis, and even to some degree, George W. Bush’s administration… This is a surprise to many people in Washington –both supporters and opponents– because, remember, this is a president who talked about not wanting to get involved in foreign entanglements… concentrate on America… not overseas. In a very short period of time, he has gotten very involved in Syria, lots of very forward-leaning threats against North Korea… and this attack against an enemy in Afghanistan that we haven’t seen before.”

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Former Australian Politician Gives Life to Christ at 85 After Lifetime of Atheism

Krauthammer articulated a similar strain of thought when he argued that the President’s recent actions should be seen as a message to the rest of the world – a message that says, “America is back, and we’ll be leading the way.”

Krauthammer: He is talking about our allies, he’s talking about how the world has stripped the middle class of its wealth. And the reason it is a radical departure is because in the inaugural address he defines national interests very narrowly, and here, what we are back to is the traditional American understanding of national interests as a broad definition going all the way back to Harry Truman in which we define our interest as worldwide. Otherwise, what is Syria to us?

Bret Baier: We don’t really know what the Trump Doctrine is, yet, but he is winning, isn’t he?

Krauthammer: Yes, I welcome this. I’m not an America Firster. I thought it was a mistake to enunciate a doctrine in the inaugural address which is we’re coming home. It scared the bee-jeebies out of our allies in NATO when he talked about it being obsolete. In the Middle East, the Gulf Arabs were scared to death. I think this is reassuring that we are returning to the classic American definition where we include our allies and most important we accept world leadership in a way that had not been accepted by Obama and seemed not to be accepted by Trump the candidate. 🇺🇸

I am the supreme law of the United States. Originally comprising seven articles, I delineate the national frame of government. My first three articles entrench the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Articles Four, Five and Six entrench concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments and of the states in relationship to the federal government. Article Seven establishes the procedure subsequently used by the thirteen States to ratify it. I am regarded as the oldest written and codified constitution in force of the world.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.