Prosecutors says Democrat Senator ‘Sold His Office’ for Lavish Trips

Editorial credit: lev radin /

If Wednesday is any indication of how the corruption trail of Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) is going to go, then he is in very big trouble.

On Wednesday prosecutors began to lay out their case against Menendez. Their argument includes; sex, copious amounts of alcohol and possibly drugs, and lavish trips around the globe. The one thing we seem to know for sure is that Menendez likes to live the good life and his government salary was no obstacle to his libido.

From CNN:

For nearly an hour, Peter Koski, deputy chief of the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section, set forth the prosecution’s case against Menendez and Melgen in colorful detail, speaking directly to the jury without any notes.

“This case is about a corrupt politician who sold his Senate office for a life of luxury he couldn’t afford and a greedy doctor who put that senator on his payroll,” Koski said.

Comparing Menendez’s lifestyle to one that “reads like a travel brochure for the rich and famous,” Koski told jurors that Menendez personally intervened in a number of business disputes that Melgen had with federal authorities in exchange for lavish gifts and large campaign donations.

“This is what bribery looks like,” Koski said, adding that “Senator Menendez was Salomon Melgen’s personal United States Senator.”

The overwhelming amount of evidence against their client isn’t the only problem that the defense has to worry about.

take our poll - story continues below

Will the Democrats try to impeach President Trump now that they control the House?

  • Will the Democrats try to impeach President Trump now that they control the House?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: The Bill of Rights: Amendments 1-10 to the U.S. Constitution

On Thursday, Menendez’s lawyers actually managed to offend the Judge trying the case by implying that he had gone out of his way to prejudice the jury against their client.

U.S. District Court Judge William H. Walls told a lawyer for Sen. Robert Menendez to “shut up for a moment” as the two engaged in a heated argument during the first moments of the New Jersey Democrat’s corruption trial.

Shortly after court proceedings began, defense attorney Raymond Brown criticized Judge William H. Walls for a line in his opinion on Friday that rejected Menendez’s request that the trial be recessed on days where the Senate is taking “critical” votes, so that the senator can be in Washington.

From Politico:

“Quite frankly, your honor, that language is extremely prejudicial to the defense and it comes form the court. I think the court has disparaged the defense,” Menendez attorney Raymond Brown said..

“Shut up for a moment if you don’t mind,” Walls said. “I said what I said” to “underscore what I considered the lack of merits in this motion,” Walls added.

Walls said he “didn’t disparage you.”

“Now I feel quasi-insulted. You tell me where I have ever speculated to affect the interest of a defendant before a jury,” Walls said. “I want you to tell me where I have done something that reasonable jurors and lawyers would consider speculative and proactive.”

Menendez’s attorney requested that the lines be struck from Walls’ opinion. Walls denied the request.

Not a great start for Team Menendez or the Democrat Party. The other Senator from New Jersey, Cory Booker (D-NJ) was also in attendance, showing solidarity with his corrupt compatriot.

There are whispers that several members of the Party are beginning to worry about the ripple effects that the Menendez trial could have on the party at large, particularly if other members of Congress get caught up in Menendez’s web of lies.

Tags 🇺🇸

I am the supreme law of the United States. Originally comprising seven articles, I delineate the national frame of government. My first three articles entrench the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Articles Four, Five and Six entrench concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments and of the states in relationship to the federal government. Article Seven establishes the procedure subsequently used by the thirteen States to ratify it. I am regarded as the oldest written and codified constitution in force of the world.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.