Brett Kavanaugh

Prosecutor Hired by Senate Has Unwelcome News for Dr. Ford

With the FBI currently working their investigation into the allegations of sexual assault against Brett Kavanaugh, opinions are being formed around the nation.

In nearly every household flying Old Glory out front, there is a discussion happening.  It may be an uncomfortable one at times, but that’s all right.  We must remember that not every bit of necessary growth has to be smooth and seamless.  This Kavanaugh circus is less of an evolution of society in the #MeToo era, and more of the last band-aid being ripped off of the liberal world of exploiting women.

Oh, you thought the left were feminists?  Think again.  The democratic position has always been to ensure the “equality of outcome”, not just plain “equality” as guaranteed in the Constitution.  By pushing for the former, the left hopes to galvanize and sequester perceived minorities in our society into voting blue.

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Migrant Caravan Marches to Border, Invoking POTUS by Name

If we just stuck to the Constitutional, traditional, conservative definition of “equality”, as defined by the Constitution, the left’s constant drivel would be reduced to the force of a dripping faucet.

But I digress.

The argument we hear in our households is about what to do next in the case of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, who last week participated in what the Senate referred to as a “job interview”, but felt more like a gotcha-questioned-based interrogation.

Now, the prosecutor hired by the Senate to question Dr. Christine Blasey Ford is speaking out, and Dr. Ford will likely not care to hear what she has to say.

Rachel Mitchell, the prosecutor who questioned Christine Blasey Ford last week during a hearing in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee, wrote a five-page memo that was released on Sunday that outlines why she would not bring criminal charges against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

Mitchell’s memo notes nine significant problems with Ford’s testimony and underscores that her case is “even weaker” than a “he said, she said” case.

Just how “weak” are we talking about?  So much so that the statement outline nine separate problems with the testimony provided by Dr. Ford.

The entire list can be read here.

 

 

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.