free speech

Piers Morgan Destroys London’s Liberal Muslim Mayor for Not Defending the City from Terrorists

Editorial credit: Frederic Legrand - COMEO /

Piers Morgan is often arrogant, self-serving, and wrong. But in a recent dust-up with London’s mayor, Sadiq Khan, he was none of these things. In fact, in their recent conversation Morgan was right on target with his cutting attacks about the mayor’s lackluster attempts to defend the people of London from radical Islam.

Piers Morgan: “Where are the 400 jihadis still in London?… You’re the mayor! WHERE ARE THEY?”

Mayor Sadiq Khan: I can’t cover 400 people…

Piers Morgan: Why not?… Why can’t you instruct the police, why can’t you… say everyone of those people who’ve come back from a war zone, I want them followed?

take our poll - story continues below

Will the Democrats try to impeach President Trump now that they control the House?

  • Will the Democrats try to impeach President Trump now that they control the House?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Freak Show

Sadiq Khan: The have to prioritize…

Piers Morgan: What could be a bigger priority than people coming back from a Syrian battlefield with the intent to harm British citizens? Why’s it not the number one priority? Why are these people allowed to just come back in in the first place and then the London mayor does not have a clue to where any of them are?

Spot on, Piers. Spot on.

Here’s the real problem. Khan has no interest in defending the city from radical Islamic terrorism. What he cares about is continuing to push the liberal narrative about Islam, immigration, terrorism, and the culture wars of the left. The terrorists aren’t the bad guys. No, the conservatives who talk about radical Islam are the bad guys. The conservatives who talk about common sense immigration laws are the bad guys. The conservatives who think that Muslim terrorism is a thing are the bad guys.

Khan won’t do anything about the 200+ Muslim terrorists who fought for ISIS in Syria and are now living, unmonitored and unmolested, in London. Why? Because in his eyes, they aren’t the problem. The problem is people like Donald Trump who say mean things about the terrorists. So what did Khan do after the London terror attack? He told Parliament to rescind permission for Trump’s state visit.

Think about that for a second. The mayor of London will fight to keep Trump out of England but he won’t fight to keep Muslim terrorists out. It’s the perfect picture of liberal policies in action, and it’s the EXACT reason that terrorism has become a major problem in Europe.

Tags 🇺🇸

I am the supreme law of the United States. Originally comprising seven articles, I delineate the national frame of government. My first three articles entrench the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Articles Four, Five and Six entrench concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments and of the states in relationship to the federal government. Article Seven establishes the procedure subsequently used by the thirteen States to ratify it. I am regarded as the oldest written and codified constitution in force of the world.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.