Perhaps the Best Explanation of the Second and Third Amendment, From a Crash Dummy

Perhaps one of the best explanations of the Second and Third Amendment is explained by a short five minute video available on Youtube, “Gun Control for Dummies, It’s Common Sense.”

The Crash Dummy reviews the first ten amendments to the Constitution, The Bill of Rights, and explains its context.

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Amid Global Turmoil, Iran Sends More Threats To US

Each amendment was listed in a specific order for a reason. The First Amendment covers four freedoms; the Second, the right to bear arms; and the Third, to safeguard individuals and families from a federal government taking their home, their land, their farm, their belongings, and their lives.

In fact, the Third Amendment is the lynchpin for all of the others.

“Can you imagine a government that can come into your home, throw you out, and then completely trash everything that you have worked for all of your life?

“If a tyrannical government was sending men into your home, would you be better off with a firearm or a kitchen knife? They come to take your home, your daughter, and leave you with nothing.”

The whole point of the Bill of Rights was to ensure that citizens have the right to protect themselves, their families, and their property– from a tyrannical government. The Third Amendment also reinforced the need for the Second Amendment.

Without the Third Amendment, the federal government could have troops or officials move into a person’s home, without their permission, destroy their land and livestock, and take members of their family. The Second Amendment enabled them to protect themselves from an armed government forcefully and illegally entering their homes.

Several instances have recently arisen in recent history.

In 2013, the Mitchell family sued the City of Henderson, Nevada, its Police Chief, five police officers, and the City of North Las Vegas and its Police Chief in Federal Court for violating their Third Amendment rights. Henderson police arrested them for refusing to allow officers to enter their home and use it as lookout to investigate their neighbors.

Some argue that the federal government’s demand for “what really is CIA and NSA squatters rights on the servers of private-sector communications companies” violates the Third Amendment. In this way, government intrudes into the private lives of citizens via the Internet and phone lines, including e-mail, phone, or social media, through its “domestic spying program.”

And, scholars at the Political Economy Research Center suggest that the Endangered Species Act– is also a violation of the Third Amendment.

For those who oppose the Second Amendment, they might want to consider how they would defend themselves from a government that would illegally take from them their home, their property, and their family.


Bethany Blankley

Bethany Blankley is a political analyst for Fox News Radio and has appeared on television and radio programs nationwide. She writes about political, cultural, and religious issues in America from the perspective of an evangelical and former communications staffer. She was a communications strategist for four U.S. Senators, one U.S. Congressman, a former New York governor, and several non-profits. She earned her MA in Theology from The University of Edinburgh, Scotland and her BA in Political Science from the University of Maryland. Follow her @bethanyblankley &

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.