One College Now Forcing Meeting Attendance Based Upon Race and Ethnicity!

From the Daily Caller News Foundation:

A Minnesota college is scrambling to apologize after it sent a letter to new non-white students ordering them to come to a special meeting whites didn’t have to attend.

In an effort to help new students of color feel more adjusted and connected to the university, a PRE-ORIENTATION SESSION WILL BE HELD ON SATURDAY, AUGUST 27th,” blares a letter sent by Concordia University in St. Paul to incoming non-white freshmen. “ALL NEW STUDENTS OF COLOR ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THIS MEETING.”

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Former Australian Politician Gives Life to Christ at 85 After Lifetime of Atheism

The special orientation meeting for non-white students isn’t new, but it’s receiving extra attention this year thanks to the university’s over-the-top way of demanding they attend.

Jeanine Flowers, who was planning to start at Concordia this fall, posted an excerpt from the letter online this week and said its tone was making her reconsider attending.

“I had to reread, wipe my eyes and have someone else to read this to make sure I was reading this correctly,” Flowers said. “This letter has made me rethink my educational institute. I supposed to start school on the 29th, but I will have to apply elsewhere. Really! I am so disappointed and I would not attend such a meeting.”

Flowers’ post was shared hundreds of times and caused quite a stir.

Ironically, though, the letter that so moved Flowers to outrage was written by a black woman, Concordia diveristy dean Cheryl Chatman, who posted a statement on the school’s website apologizing for the tone of the letter and pledging to change it in the future. Chatman said that even though the letter told all non-white students they were expected at the meeting, that didn’t make it mandatory.

“Clearly our excitement to ensure that our students realized the importance of this meeting may have been interpreted as required or mandatory instead of warm and welcoming,” Chatman said.

Chatman added that it was “unfortunate” Flowers had shared only a portion of the letter, leaving out later parts which made it clear the letter was intended to discuss all the minority-focused groups available at Concordia.

Chatman also reached out to Flowers, who posted an update on Facebook saying that she remained furious over the letter even after getting an explanation.

“My opinion about this letter in no way changed and I expressed that to her,” she said. “I told her there is a better way and how offensive that letter is not just to me, but a lot of people. Though her intent was not to segregate or isolate ‘people of color,’ that’s exactly what that letter did.”

Despite still being angry, Flowers said she was willing to work with Chatman to improve communication in the future.

Constitution.com 🇺🇸

I am the supreme law of the United States. Originally comprising seven articles, I delineate the national frame of government. My first three articles entrench the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Articles Four, Five and Six entrench concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments and of the states in relationship to the federal government. Article Seven establishes the procedure subsequently used by the thirteen States to ratify it. I am regarded as the oldest written and codified constitution in force of the world.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.