The “Nasty,” Crude Women’s March and our Children

We all owe a debt of gratitude to the folks at the Washington Free Beacon (WFB). Those brilliant pot-stirrers did the hard work of watching all of the nasty, crude, vitriol-filled, hate-mongering speeches from Saturday’s many protests and then cut them all together to show us what our opponents are really like.

The WFB displayed footage from starlets Ashley Judd, Madonna, and Scarlett Johansson saying the most vile, disgusting things you can imagine.

However, to listen to any of the women who were marching, or offering support to the marchers, their entire purpose was to show their daughters that women are valuable, equal to men, or powerful. How this litany of revolting dialogue offers any evidence of this supposed equality or of the “power” of women, escapes this writer.

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Migrant Caravan Marches to Border, Invoking POTUS by Name

In fact, I would argue that this kind of speech accomplishes the opposite of what the marchers, protesters, and speakers all said they intended. How could any parent who truly cares for their children, their daughters in particular, allow the vile conversation being spewed by these women to enter the little ears of their precious children?

The always-brilliant Derek Hunter cut to the heart of the matter and exposed the madness that these marches were intended to edify the “children.”

Screen Shot 2017-01-24 at 2.19.20 PM

Amen to that. Parents teach your children well, don’t rely on celebrities, or the government to convey the message that your kids are valuable. All of our children are inherently and innately valuable, and it doesn’t matter what any famous people say, the truth of their value won’t change.

Tags 🇺🇸

I am the supreme law of the United States. Originally comprising seven articles, I delineate the national frame of government. My first three articles entrench the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Articles Four, Five and Six entrench concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments and of the states in relationship to the federal government. Article Seven establishes the procedure subsequently used by the thirteen States to ratify it. I am regarded as the oldest written and codified constitution in force of the world.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.