Rioters in an immigrant suburb in Stockholm responded to an arrest by throwing rocks at police, setting fires, looting, and beating up people.
No sooner has the media spent a news cycle treating Donald Trump as a fake news propagandist about migrants in Sweden, than we get this AP story about a predominately immigrant suburb in Stockholm:
Swedish police on Tuesday were investigating a riot that broke out overnight in a predominantly immigrant suburb in Stockholm after officers arrested a suspect on drug charges.
One officer was slightly injured when a rock hit his arm and one person was arrested for throwing rocks, police spokesman Lars Bystrom said Tuesday. Some civilians who tried to stop the looters were also assaulted, he added.
Another officer fired his gun, not as a warning shot but because he was “in a situation that demanded he used his firearm,” Bystrom said, adding “no one was hit.”
Here’s some raw footage from RT’s YouTube channel:
Does that look like a scene created by people who appreciate their community and are invested in its future?
I’ll answer my own question: No, it looks like the result of a population that is seething with hatred for the wider community.
At the same time, the information that the stores in Rinkeby looted and that a shopkeeper was beaten when he tried to intervene against looters.
The owner of one of the affected stores had direct alarm to his home. When he goes to the store, he is beaten, says Bystrom.
A total of at least two people have been assaulted. The battered shop owner cared for now in hospital for their injuries.
Meanwhile, Liberals continue to do everything they can to create “plausible deniability” about what is obviously going on in Sweden.
Below, Tucker Carlson interviews two people about Sweden. They both do everything they can to deny there is a problem or deny that we have any evidence of a problem. But if you listen to the second guest at 11:36 and following, she implicitly admits all:
According to her, Sweden has admitted so many refugees, in proportion to its native population, that America would have to take in six to seven million immigrants in the same time period.
Her point is that Sweden has nothing to do with American immigration.
But how does that follow from her argument?
She’s just admitted that Swedish politicians acted against the interests of the people and imported a huge population that they could not possibly accommodate.
Are we supposed to believe that Liberals would not do the same here? We have no reason to think our Liberal politicians are smarter or wiser or more well-intentioned (or less evil) than Swedish ones.
The only rational time to panic is before it’s too late. And the reply is always: “It’s not time to panic yet.” That’s what Liberals are saying to us about immigration while we watch the results of their goals for us bring European nations down.