First Amendment

Liberals Rip Berkeley Snowflakes for Undermining Free Speech and Acting like “F***ing Babies”

Two prominent liberals, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and HBO TV host Bill Maher, decided to speak out against against the campus snowflakes at Berkeley. Both men spent time over the weekend arguing that conservatives like Ann Coulter have every right to be heard on college campuses across the country, and it’s simply ridiculous for liberal students to expend so much effort to silence them instead of debating them on the issues. More importantly, both men argued that Democrat leader Howard Dean (and many other liberals) are simply wrong about certain kinds of free speech not being protected.

Let’s start with Bernie Sanders who is probably the more important voice to hear from:

“Obviously Ann Coulter’s outrageous ― to my mind, off the wall,” Sanders argued. “But you know, people have a right to give their two cents-worth, give a speech, without fear of violence and intimidation.” Sanders then lambasted the liberal protesters for fighting so hard to keep conservatives like Coulter out. “What are you afraid of ― her ideas?” asked Sanders, according to HuffPo. “Ask her the hard questions. Confront her intellectually. Booing people down, or intimidating people, or shutting down events, I don’t think that that works in any way.”

take our poll - story continues below

Will the Democrats try to impeach President Trump now that they control the House?

  • Will the Democrats try to impeach President Trump now that they control the House?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: The Bill of Rights: Amendments 1-10 to the U.S. Constitution

Bill Maher made a similar argument, though he did so much more colorfully. Maher also added an important point about free speech that completely contradicts the argument that some liberals are making, that “hate speech” is not protected free speech.

Bill Maher: I like her as a person. I’ve never agreed with one thing she ever said. That’s different…

I was the speaker at Berkeley a couple of years ago and they disinvited me and then they got their act together and I wound up doing it, and apparently, that’s what’s going to happen to her. I think. But, Berkeley, used to be the cradle of free speech but now it’s the cradle for f***ing babies.

This goes on all over the country on campuses. They invite someone to speak who is not exactly what liberals want to hear and they want to shut her down. I feel like this is the liberals’ version of book burning, and it’s got to stop.

Howard Dean tweeted today about this, ‘Hate speech is not protected by the First Amendment.’ Yes, it is. Threats are not protected by the First Amendment. This is why the Supreme Court said that the Nazis could march in Skokie. They are a hateful bunch. But that is what the First Amendment means. It doesn’t mean just shut up and agree with me.

S.E. Cupp: I can’t believe you have to remind liberals this.

Bill Maher: I can’t believe it either.

I want to settle on Maher’s point about “hate speech” and free speech for just a moment… because it’s an important point. Many conservatives have argued that hate speech is protected, because free speech is really all about protecting unpopular speech. If only acceptable speech is allowed, than speech is most certainly NOT free.

Also, since when do liberals get to decide what “hate speech” is? For example, liberal college students argue that Ann Coulter, Ben Shapiro, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Bill Maher, Condoleezza Rice, Dick Cheney, and many others have been disinvited, protested, shouted down, and worse… for spouting what the protesters called “hate speech.” None of these people have ever said one word of hate speech, which simply serves to prove the point that liberals should not be the arbiters of what hate speech is.

Tags 🇺🇸

I am the supreme law of the United States. Originally comprising seven articles, I delineate the national frame of government. My first three articles entrench the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Articles Four, Five and Six entrench concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments and of the states in relationship to the federal government. Article Seven establishes the procedure subsequently used by the thirteen States to ratify it. I am regarded as the oldest written and codified constitution in force of the world.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.