Liberal Senator Admits No Evidence of Trump-Russia Connection

Liberal Democrat leader Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) bluntly admitted that there was simply “NO EVIDENCE” of any collusion between the Trump campaign for President and the Russian government. NONE.

The comments came during a discussion with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, and the host seemed taken aback by the Democrats “precise” and honest assessment.

Trending: Kellyanne Conway Makes HEAVY Statement on Kavanaugh Accuser

“Do you have evidence that there was in fact collusion between Trump associates and Russia during the campaign?” CNN’s Wolf Blitzer asked California Sen. Dianne Feinstein during an interview on Wednesday.

“Not at this time,” she responded.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Well, that’s a pretty precise answer,” Blitzer said.

Feinstein qualified her answer by saying “Not at this time,” but still, at least she was willing to directly admit that there was just no evidence that the Trump team had done anything wrong.

While other Democrats continue to pretend that there is reason to believe that President Trump has dubious connections to the Kremlin, none have yet offered any evidence that would corroborate their claims. Thankfully, Feinstein avoided the slander and cut straight to the point and admitted that she hadn’t seen anything, even if her answer does reveal that she hopes they find something soon.

One of those other Democrats (who can’t actually point to specific evidence) is California liberal Eric Swalwell (D-CA) who recently told Chris Matthews that there sure was evidence of collusion.

Again, Swalwell can’t actually point to any specifics… but who cares about facts when you’re on MSNBC?

Tags

Constitution.com 🇺🇸

I am the supreme law of the United States. Originally comprising seven articles, I delineate the national frame of government. My first three articles entrench the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Articles Four, Five and Six entrench concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments and of the states in relationship to the federal government. Article Seven establishes the procedure subsequently used by the thirteen States to ratify it. I am regarded as the oldest written and codified constitution in force of the world.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.