Keeping Obamacare? Senate Conservatives aren’t Happy with the Senate Healthcare Bill

Editorial credit: CJ Hanevy/ Shutterstock.com

To say that Senate conservatives are “unhappy” with the Senate’s first version of their new healthcare bill, would probably be a bit of an understatement. However, it doesn’t seem like we should be without hope of a new bill passing.

Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) told MSNBC that the “current draft doesn’t get the job done… but there is an agreement to be reached.”

Cruz is often seen as the most unbending member of the conservative caucus in the Senate, but the truth is that he has flexed far more often than a few of his more congenial counterparts (like Mike Lee, Ben Sasse, and Rand Paul). There is likely a deal to be made that could get Senator Cruz to sign on to the health bill, but Senators Lee, Sasse, and Paul will be far more difficult sells.

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Migrant Caravan Marches to Border, Invoking POTUS by Name

In fact, while Senator Cruz was optimistic for a deal, Senator Paul seemed resigned to the idea that we’d be stuck with Obamacare forever.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UROyUK0ykxQ

Later in the day, Senator Paul told CBS News that there were at least 4 Republican no votes for the current Senate bill.

Paul also made an appearance on Fox News to explain why he was so adamantly opposed to the current bill.

I keep reading this and it sounds like Obamacare — not even Obamacare-lite. It might even be Obamacare-plus on the subsidies side. We can’t have a bill that spends more than Obamacare in the first couple years and call that a repeal bill…

We have to have sufficient confidence in capitalism, competition, and free markets. And I don’t think we do. I think we’re replacing them with little Obamacares. We don’t really believe the market will work, because what we’re doing is: The death spirals we’ve talked about so much. We’re just dumping a bunch of money into the individual markets and saying the prices will be lower.

You know what else we could do that with? New cars. Why don’t we have a new car stabilization fund? Or a college stabilization fund? Or an iPhone stabilization fund. Those would not be Republican ideas, and they would be laughed out of Congress.

The same should happen for a stabilization fund where we dump taxpayer dollars into insurance company’s coffers, who are already making billions per year.

On CNN Paul repeated many of the same themes:

My opposition has been principled. In the sense that I think the marketplace works better. I think freedom works better than coercion.

I think the federal government shouldn’t be giving any money to insurance companies. The insurance companies made $15 billion in profits last year. The new Republican bill will give them $110 billion to ‘bring down prices.’ That is a ludicrous economic theory.

We’re going to subsidize the cost to bring it down — we’re ignoring the fact that our annual budget is $500 billion in debt. How are we going to pay for all this new spending?

So yea… the conservatives are not excited about this bill.

Constitution.com 🇺🇸

I am the supreme law of the United States. Originally comprising seven articles, I delineate the national frame of government. My first three articles entrench the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Articles Four, Five and Six entrench concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments and of the states in relationship to the federal government. Article Seven establishes the procedure subsequently used by the thirteen States to ratify it. I am regarded as the oldest written and codified constitution in force of the world.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.