House Intelligence Committee Releases Democrat Memo on FISA Abuse

From the Daily Caller News Foundation:

The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence released a highly anticipated memo on Saturday that Democrats say provides clarification about the FBI and Justice Department’s application for a spy warrant on President Donald Trump’s former campaign adviser Carter Page.

The 10-page document aims to rebut claims made in a memo released Feb. 2 by committee Republicans.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Jim Acosta have gotten his press pass back?

  • Should Jim Acosta have gotten his press pass back?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Watch Obama Trash the USA 18 Different Times During His Recent Trip Abroad

In that first memo, Republicans asserted that the FBI and Justice Department relied heavily on the unverified Steele dossier to obtain a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant in Oct. 2016 to spy on Page. U.S. officials also failed to disclose that the dossier was funded by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee, Republicans claimed.

Democrats dispute that characterization, saying the Justice Department disclosed that the dossier was funded by a politically motived client.

“The FBI speculates that the identified U.S. person was likely looking for information that could be used to discredit [Trump’s] campaign,” reads the memo, quoting from the FISA application.

Democrats also assert in their memo that parts of the Steele dossier were corroborated “through multiple independent sources.”

Page met secretly with two Kremlin insiders, Igor Sechin and Igor Diveykin, during a well-publicized trip to Moscow in July 2016, according to the dossier. The dossier also alleges that Page was working with former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort as part of the collusion effort.

Corroborated information about Page is redacted from the Democratic memo.

Page has vehemently denied meeting with Sechin and Diveykin and says he has never met Manafort.

Democrats also claim that the FISAs against Page “allowed FBI to collect valuable intelligence.” A paragraph laying out the purported evidence is largely redacted from the memo.

Democrats also rebut the Republican claim that the FBI and DOJ omitted material facts about Steele in the FISA applications. The Republican memo stated that U.S. officials failed to tell the FISA court that the FBI severed its relationship with Steele after the first FISA was obtained because he made unauthorized contacts with the media.

Steele was a source for a Oct. 31, 2016, article published by Mother Jones.

Democrats claim that the FBI “properly notified” the FISA court about severing its relationship with Steele.

Read the Democrats’ memo here:

Democrat Memo by Chuck Ross on Scribd

Constitution.com 🇺🇸

I am the supreme law of the United States. Originally comprising seven articles, I delineate the national frame of government. My first three articles entrench the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Articles Four, Five and Six entrench concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments and of the states in relationship to the federal government. Article Seven establishes the procedure subsequently used by the thirteen States to ratify it. I am regarded as the oldest written and codified constitution in force of the world.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.