Here’s What Has Happened With Diamond and Silk Since Tuesday

While testifying before a House committee on Wednesday, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg told Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, that the company’s designation of the popular pro-Trump duo Diamond and Silk as “unsafe” was an “enforcement error.”

Barton, The Verge said, started his questioning by reading a query he got through Facebook: “Please ask Mr. Zuckerberg, why is Facebook censoring conservative bloggers such as Diamond and Silk? Facebook called them ‘unsafe to the community.’ That is ludicrous. They hold conservative views. That isn’t unsafe.”

Zuckerberg floated the company’s usual excuse in these situations, telling Barton that, “in that specific case, our team made an enforcement error, and we have already gotten in touch with them to reverse it.”

take our poll - story continues below

Will the Democrats try to impeach President Trump now that they control the House?

  • Will the Democrats try to impeach President Trump now that they control the House?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: The Bill of Rights: Amendments 1-10 to the U.S. Constitution

But as we reported Tuesday, the ladies said they had never heard from the company.

Twitchy noted a question that wasn’t asked:


Good questions.  Chances are that outside of even more investigation or discovery as part of a lawsuit, we’ll never get a real answer.

Zuckerberg, however, was right about one thing — his company made a mistake.  But was it an accident?  That’s the question that really needs to be asked and answered.

I’ve been covering these kinds of issues since 2010 and have documented perhaps hundreds of incidents where the social media site made highly questionable decisions against its users.

For example, one conservative user was told her profile picture of a lilac tree was pornographic.  In another case, a user was told that a picture of a 2012 Donald Trump campaign button violated the site’s rules on nudity.  The picture only showed his face.

Pro-Trump pages have been yanked over false claims of nudity.  A 132,000 strong pro-Trump group, “Donald J. Trump president of the United States,” was deleted by Facebook with no reason given.

“Wake Up America,” a pro-Trump page with more than 300,000 followers, was removed by Facebook after false claims of content violations.  At the time, we looked at the page and found nothing that violated the company’s terms.

One conservative page was yanked for daring to oppose the transgender agenda and an international page dedicated to supporting veterans who suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, or PTSD, was yanked by Facebook over an image that doesn’t come close to violating the site’s standards.  The page was eventually restored, but some administrators were still banned from doing anything.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.