Bakers who have refused to make cakes or flower arrangements for same-sex weddings have been hauled into court and made to pay huge fines.
One fine is $135,000. No one should be forced to make a cake, print a t-shirt, or film an event if the proprietor has issues with the content.
Who would blame a black-owned print shop for refusing to print signs for a KKK march?
Should a film company be forced to film a Nazi-themed wedding?
Long before homosexuals have intimidated states into bowing to their demands, business owners had the discretion to refuse business for any reason.
It’s called liberty.
The question is, where are those in the media who support forcing companies to comply with laws put in place specifically for homosexuals when a story like the following comes in view?:
A boy whose letter to President Trump made national headlines last month reportedly wanted a pro-Trump cake for his birthday party, but his mother was unable to find a baker willing to fulfill the order.
At the July 26 White House press briefing, Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders read a letter from a boy named Dylan who said Mr. Trump was his favorite president. When she later released the letter publicly, the boy’s last name was blacked out. The only identifying clue was that everyone called him “Pickle.”
The media scrambled to verify the letter’s authenticity, and the next day, The Washington Post confirmed it was sent by 9-year-old Dylan Harbin of California.
The Post reported that, when Dylan asked for a “Donald Trump cake” for his birthday, his mother “made him one herself, because she couldn’t find a bakery willing and able to do it.”
Every bakery that refused to make Dylan’s “Donald Trump Cake” had that right, and so should the people who refused to make a cake for a same-sex wedding.
I’m sure there were bakeries that would have made a cake for a same-sex wedding, or a KKK-themed wedding, or a Nazi-themed wedding, or whatever.
And if there’s wasn’t one, those wanting such cakes could have made one like Dylan’s mother did…