Green Party Presidential Candidate says She Wouldn’t have Killed Osama bin Laden

From the Daily Caller News Foundation:

Green Party candidate Dr. Jill Stein said she wouldn’t have killed terrorist Osama bin Laden on the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks.

Trending: TSA Head Honcho Confirms Our Worst Suspicions About His Useless Agency

“I think assassinations … they’re against international law to start with and to that effect, I think I would not have assassinated Osama bin Laden but would have captured him and brought him to trial,” she told the Des Moines Register.

The founder of al-Qaida, who was killed by Navy SEALs in 2011, was responsible for the deaths of nearly 3,000 when planes hit the Twin Towers and the Pentagon and United Airlines Flight 93 crashed in Pennsylvania.

Stein, a strong supporter of steep military cuts, said while she does believe repercussions against bin Laden were in order, she thinks it was handled the wrong way.

“I think all evidence certainly points to bin Laden, but the 9/11 attackers had assistance and funding and bin Laden had assistance and funding,” she continued. “What we should have done is declare this a crime against humanity and pursued it, pursued the attackers and gotten the intelligence about who was behind this.”

The candidate released a statement on her website Saturday calling for a new investigation into the 9/11 attacks, alleging the 2002 congressional report released was not comprehensive enough.

“Under our administration a new inquiry would have access to the considerable body of responsible independent research that has emerged over the last 15 years,” the statement reads. “We would create an independent 9/11 Commission, not one dominated by members with an interest in protecting the reputation and careers of foreign affairs and intelligence communities.”

Stein, who currently has a warrant out for her arrest for misdemeanor charges of criminal trespass and criminal mischief, is currently polling on average at 3.1 percent.

Tags

Constitution.com 🇺🇸

I am the supreme law of the United States. Originally comprising seven articles, I delineate the national frame of government. My first three articles entrench the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Articles Four, Five and Six entrench concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments and of the states in relationship to the federal government. Article Seven establishes the procedure subsequently used by the thirteen States to ratify it. I am regarded as the oldest written and codified constitution in force of the world.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.