Government Surveillance Slipped into Omnibus Bill Would Eliminate Internet Privacy

Last night Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (-R-W) put forth a 2,000-page omnibus bill, which includes the full text of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 (CISA), which the Senate passed in October.

CISA, in reality is a government surveillance bill, which makes it easier for private sector companies to share user information with the government. It removes all user privacy and liability protections in the name of “cybersecurity,” turning Internet companies into “defacto surveillance” conglomerates.

Wired Magazine says “CISA Gets an F+ for security and an A for spying.” Wired highlights the false claims Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Sen. Richard Burr made after the committee passed the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act by a vote of 14 to 1.  Burr argued CISA “successfully balanced security and privacy. The bill protects Internet users’ personal information and allows new avenues for companies and federal agencies to coordinate responses to cyberattacks.

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Migrant Caravan Marches to Border, Invoking POTUS by Name

A coalition opposing CISA, Wired reports:

“CISA goes far beyond [cybersecurity], and permits law enforcement to use information it receives for investigations and prosecutions of a wide range of crimes involving any level of physical force.”

“The lack of use limitations creates yet another loophole for law enforcement to conduct backdoor searches on Americans—including searches of digital communications that would otherwise require law enforcement to obtain a warrant based on probable cause. This undermines Fourth Amendment protections and constitutional principles.”

Evan Greer, campaign director for Fight the Future, which has directed a multi-faceted campaign against the bill, also says:

“It’s a disingenuous attempt to quietly expand the U.S. government’s surveillance programs. It’s clear this bill was never intended to prevent cyber attacks.”

According to, the bill strips out all privacy protections, allowing the government to abuse and ignore the Fourth Amendment, turning “CISA into a full on surveillance bill.” Personal information would be freely shared with the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Department of Defense and much more. writes that CISA:

  1. Removes the prohibition on information being shared with the NSA, allowing it to be shared directly with NSA (and DOD), rather than first having to go through DHS. While DHS isn’t necessarily wonderful, it’s a lot better than NSA. And, of course, if this were truly about cybersecurity, not surveillance, DHS makes a lot more sense than NSA.
  2. Directly removes the restrictions on using this information for “surveillance” activities. You can’t get much more direct than that, right?
  3. Removes limitations that government can only use this information for cybersecurity purposes and allows it to be used to go after any other criminal activity as well. Obviously, this then creates tremendous incentives to push for greater and greater information collection, which clearly will be abused. We’ve just seen how the DEA has regularly abused its powers to collect info. You think agencies like the DEA and others won’t make use of CISA too?
  4. Removes the requirement to “scrub” personal information unrelated to a cybersecurity threat before sharing that information. This was the key point that everyone kept making about why the information should go to DHS first — where DHS would be in charge of this “scrub”. The “scrub” process was a bit exaggerated in the first place, but it was at least something of a privacy protection. However, it appears that the final version being pushed removes the scrub requirement (along with the requirement to go to DHS) and instead leaves the question of scrubbing to the “discretion” of whichever agency gets the information.

The Omnibus Bill has not yet passed Congress, but if it does the President is likely to sign.

In addition to CISA the Omnibus Bill contains language to continue funding the importation of refugees.





Bethany Blankley

Bethany Blankley is a political analyst for Fox News Radio and has appeared on television and radio programs nationwide. She writes about political, cultural, and religious issues in America from the perspective of an evangelical and former communications staffer. She was a communications strategist for four U.S. Senators, one U.S. Congressman, a former New York governor, and several non-profits. She earned her MA in Theology from The University of Edinburgh, Scotland and her BA in Political Science from the University of Maryland. Follow her @bethanyblankley &

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.