These Five States Will Have No Health Insurance Options in 2017

They will have no health insurance options because only one company offers plans on the exchanges.

These states will have no health insurance options because all the other insurance companies got tired of losing money.

Trending: Judge Kavanaugh’s Wife Dragged into Fray By Despicable Democrats

In Alabama, Alaska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Wyoming, residents will not be given any options at healthcare.gov. There will only be a single company offering plans. Their only choice will be to accept that policy or not get health insurance until the penalty becomes too harsh.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

And the problem goes far beyond those five state. Last year, only two percent of enrollees were stuck with only one health insurance provider for their counties. In 2017, almost a fifth of American enrollees will be in that situation.

Remember, the Democrats (and many Republican traitors) think it is unthinkable to simply repeal the Affordable Care Act no matter how unaffordable it is and how little care is given.

Thus, the only options that these people will acknowledge as “reasonable,” are increasing the severity of the penalties for not enrolling in Obamacare, increasing subsidies, and introducing a pure government option.

All these things will simply make prices go up. Rationing will eventually be added to the mix to address the prices that the government’s tampering has caused to go up.

What is absolutely unthinkable is letting free people take care of themselves and meet needs in an unhampered marketplace. The answer to government disaster is never to remove government but always add more government.

According to columnist A. Barton Hinkle, at Reason.com:

The obvious lesson here is that the government shouldn’t try to hammer square pegs into round holes. So naturally, Washington is ignoring it. President Obama thinks the answer is to create a “public option”—a government insurance program—for the exchanges, to spur competition.

Brilliant plan: Insurance companies already have a hard time eking out a profit on the exchanges, so set up a nonprofit competitor to underbid them. That’ll have them knocking down the door to get back in, right?

To others, the answer lies in jacking up the federal tax penalties levied on those who don’t buy insurance to make nonparticipation altogether too painful. In their view, government is just not being punitive enough.

It’s not surprising that politicians think this way. It is surprising that voters go along with it.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.