ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith Defends Donald Trump from Hypocrite Liberals

Stephen A. Smith is no stranger to controversy.

Trending: Kellyanne Conway Makes HEAVY Statement on Kavanaugh Accuser

He has made a name for himself as one of the sports world’s most popular pundits by speaking directly and openly about the things he believes and the things he sees. On more than a few occasions, his direct manner has caused major waves and led to his suspension and forced apologies. However, his most recent controversial statement may be the most impactful he’s ever made… and it was all in defense of Donald J. Trump.

Smith was upset that so many African-American leaders were being hypocritical and divisive in the run-up to the presidential inauguration later this week.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUqmJwn-7lc

When noted comedian and host of the hit show Family Feud Steve Harvey exited from a meeting with President-elect Donald Trump last week calling him “a great man” to say there was a backlash would be a gross understatement. The word ‘coon and ‘sellout’ was immediately thrown out. 

His friend and contemporary D.L. Hughley wasn’t happy either, aiming his vitriol at Trump instead of Steve Harvey. And of course it provided the perfect excuse for naysayers to accuse sports greats like Jim Brown and Ray Lewis of being used as photo-ops weeks ago.

But on a day like today when we celebrate the birthdate of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr, along with his undeniable historical impact, perhaps it is time for all of us to see the big picture, to essentially pay more attention to the issues permeating our society, what it will take to resolve them, and connecting ourselves to who we can ultimately hold accountable rather than focusing on disdain for that very individual in a position to make a difference. Knowing that is not going to get us anywhere.

Has anyone thought about what impact it could have if Trump spoke to LeBron James? How about Steph Curry? How about Mike Tomlin, Tony Dungy, Chris Paul, Adam Jones of the Baltimore Orioles, or a host of conscientious sports figures connected to communities, committed to helping inner cities ascend from an abyss that has plagued us for decades. What then? Will they be sellouts, too, just for meeting with the man? For expressing their concerns? For articulating what ails these communities and providing ideas on how to resolve problems? The answer is no. At least for anyone with sense.

So here’s hoping Trump calls all of those guys and then some. So why have a problem with Steve Harvey? While few of us are interested in helping in hearing praise for Trump at this moment, let’s not confuse that with recognizing the position he’s in, respecting it and using our intellect to decipher where we go from here, not our emotions. After all, how far has that gotten us?

Thank you for speaking out Stpehen A.; hopefully someone was listening.

NFL Hall of Famer Jim Brown echoed Stephen A.’s comments on Fox Business’ Varney & Co. when he reacted to Rep. John Lewis’ decision to argue that Trump was not a “legitimate” president.

He won, in my opinion, fair and square, and I’m going to support him as president of the United States…

When you win against all odds and you defeat those who are against you — and I was for Hillary so I’m one of those who Mr. Trump defeated — but he is the president-elect of the United States, I’m a citizen. I’m not asking him to do everything. I’m going to pitch in and do some of the things that I can do with the like-minded people that I represent.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQQSyAmTFZ8

Tags

Constitution.com 🇺🇸

I am the supreme law of the United States. Originally comprising seven articles, I delineate the national frame of government. My first three articles entrench the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Articles Four, Five and Six entrench concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments and of the states in relationship to the federal government. Article Seven establishes the procedure subsequently used by the thirteen States to ratify it. I am regarded as the oldest written and codified constitution in force of the world.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.