Why do Democrats Hate School Choice?

Photo courtesy of National School Choice Week

Since Donald Trump’s election the Democrat Party has spent the bulk of its time making complete and utter fools of themselves. The best examples of this have come during the confirmation process for Trump’s cabinet. The process is usually nothing but a formality as Congress has long held a view that the President should have the opportunity to fill his Cabinet with his trusted advisors. Sadly, the Democrats have now politicized this process and have made it near impossible for Trump’s Cabinet to be filled. In fact, no President in history has ever had fewer of his Cabinet positions filled at this point in his presidency.

Trending: Trump Lawyers Have A Strong Message For Mueller If Rod Resigns

This past week the Democrats hemmed, hawed, and clamored against the highly qualified Rep. Tom Price (R-GA) for Health and Human Services Secretary, the honorable Jeff Sessions (R-AL) for Attorney General, and the education advocate Betsy DeVos for Education Secretary. All three of these perfectly qualified and highly suited people were fought against tooth and nail by a despicable Democrat Senate.

However, it may have been the attacks on Betsy DeVos that were the most head-scratching. DeVos is NOT a politicians and never has been. She has been an advocate for education, donating years of her life to the children of Michigan in an effort to improve the quality of education for every child in her home state. The biggest issue that Democrats seem to have with DeVos is her support of school choice, but this is an issue where there is much division within Democrat ranks, as the majority of black Americans support school choice.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Which begs the question, if so many Americans support school choice, why do Democrats fight so hard against it? On that Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly has some thoughts…

As you may know, the Democratic Party is split between moderates and far-left folks.

But it is the ideological zealots that get most of the attention.

This week, Betsy DeVos was confirmed as Education Secretary.

But before that vote took place, liberal bomb thrower Al Franken attacked Ms. DeVos in the Senate.

Al Franken: “It was one of the most embarrassing scenes I’ve been witness to during my time in the United States Senate. In fact, I believe it may have been one of the most embarrassing performances by a nominee in the history of the United States Senate.”

Now the reason Franken does not like Betsy DeVos is that she is a champion of school choice.

She has devoted much of her life to trying to bring quality education to poor children, often trapped in bad inner-city schools.

You would think that an uber-liberal like Franken would approve of trying to help poor kids. But he does not.


School ChoiceBecause by offering school vouchers and encouraging charter schools, which are run apart from the public school system, Ms. DeVos is challenging the powerful teachers’ unions.

And those unions and their associates have donated more than $150,000 to Al Franken campaigns.

How enlightening.

So Franken, like many politicians, panders to those who give him money.

It is beyond question that poor American children, often minorities, are not getting the same quality of education that middle class and wealthy children are getting.

So why not try something new? Why not try school choice? Why not give poor parents subsidies to choose better schools for their kids?

How long are we going to put up with discrimination against the poor?

How long, Al?

In another far-left adventure, Senator Elizabeth Warren, as close to a socialist as you can be, attacked Senator Jeff Sessions in the hearings over whether Mr. Sessions should become the new attorney general.

What Warren did was try to read a letter written by Coretta Scott King 31 years ago that criticized Mr. Sessions.

It all had to do with the senator prosecuting a voter fraud case in Alabama while he was a U.S. Attorney there.

The situation involved three civil rights activists who Sessions believed were committing voter fraud.

The three were ultimately acquitted of the charges, and Mrs. King was furious with the case.

Again, that was 31 years ago. But last night, seeking to paint Jeff Sessions as a racist, Warren brought it up in the Senate.

Mitch McConnell: “The Senator has impugned the motives and conduct of our colleague from Alabama as warned by the chair. Senator Warren, quote said Senator ‘Sessions has used the awesome power of his office to chill the free exercise of the vote by black citizens.’

Elizabeth Warren: “I am surprised that the words of Coretta Scott King are not suitable for debate in the United States Senate, I ask leave of the Senate to continue my remarks.”

Steve Daines: “Is there objection?”

Mitch McConnell: “Object.”

Elizabeth Warren: “I appeal the ruling.”

Steve Daines: “The objection is heard. The Senator will take her seat.”

Later, Senator Warren read the letter on Facebook.

Now you can decide whether the far left is really looking out for the country by objecting to school choice and trying to smear a man like Senator Sessions.

That call is entirely up to you.

But what is crystal clear is the huge divide between the attitudes of the far left and moderates in the Democratic Party, not to mention Republicans, where there is no common ground at all.

Talking Points believes that honest debate is necessary. But part of that equation is letting you know what’s really going on behind the scenes.


Constitution.com 🇺🇸

I am the supreme law of the United States. Originally comprising seven articles, I delineate the national frame of government. My first three articles entrench the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Articles Four, Five and Six entrench concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments and of the states in relationship to the federal government. Article Seven establishes the procedure subsequently used by the thirteen States to ratify it. I am regarded as the oldest written and codified constitution in force of the world.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.