The Democrat Party in Denial: Placing Blame Everywhere but Where it Belongs

Make a list of everyone the Democrat Party has blamed for their 2016 electoral loss (it may actually be easier to make a list of everyone they haven’t blamed) and you’ll find one interesting name not on the list… Hillary Clinton.

On Monday the National Journal’s Ron Fournier exposed this problem with one simple tweet:

The folks at MSNBC’s Morning Joe used the Fournier tweet as a jumping off point to an important discussion about the Democrat Party’s seemingly constant state of denial, wondering why they would choose to blame anyone (and everyone) not named Hillary Clinton.

If you’re keeping track since her loss on November 8th, Hillary Clinton’s Democrat supporters (and the media, but I repeat myself) have blamed the FBI, James Comey, the media, Russian hackers, Vladimir Putin, Huma Abedin, Anthony Weiner, President Barack Obama, and the voters themselves.

On Morning Joe Elise Jordan, a former advisor to Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), makes an astute point when she notes that the Democrats seem to be laying the groundwork to repeat all of their recent mistakes. She argues that by choosing to ignore the real problem with the 2016 election, the Democrats are setting themselves up for a tremendous failure come 2018.

It gets worse, apparently Hillary’s supporters aren’t the only ones in denial… so is the candidate herself.

“It’s just this utter incapability for self-examination. 

It’s the Russians fault. It’s Comey’s fault.  ..It’s Obama’s fault. It’s fake News’s fault. It’s the media’s fault. She took another gratuitous swipe at the media saying it was our fault. 

But what all of this allows them and the Democratic party to do is to avoid the tough questions about why they lost and how they alienated such a large bloc of voters that they needed to win.  …And the fact that none of them saw this for the election this was.”

In fact, the 2016 election is barely over and already some respected pundits are wondering if the GOP isn’t destined to win a major supermajority in Congress come 2018.

The GOP’s strong 2016 election showing raises a crucial question: Do Republicans have any chance of netting eight Senate seats – and a filibuster-proof majority – in 2018?

The upcoming Senate class is unusually unbalanced. Only eight Republican Senate seats are up for election in 2018, compared to 25 Democratic seats (including two independents who caucus with the Democrats). Ten of those Democratic seats are in states carried by Donald Trump.

By any measure, Democrats are on the defensive in the next fight for Senate control. A three-seat Democratic midterm gain, which would give the party a majority, looks virtually impossible given the seats up this cycle.


The continued Democrat denial is music to the GOP’s ears and while the whining certainly is annoying, if it means more conservative policies and smaller government, Republicans are happy to learn to deal with it.

Tags 🇺🇸

I am the supreme law of the United States. Originally comprising seven articles, I delineate the national frame of government. My first three articles entrench the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Articles Four, Five and Six entrench concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments and of the states in relationship to the federal government. Article Seven establishes the procedure subsequently used by the thirteen States to ratify it. I am regarded as the oldest written and codified constitution in force of the world.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.