This Is Why We Don’t Need Consumer Protection Laws [VIDEO]

Consumer protection laws end up getting controlled by corporate interests.

A jury sided with Minute Maid, which will probably cause many to call for more consumer protection laws. But the lawsuit against Coca-Cola, which owns Minute Maid, actually demonstrates the opposite—we don’t need consumer protection laws to ensure quality. Nor does a company have to lose a lawsuit to be stopped.

The lawsuit was brought against Coca-Cola by POM, which sells a pomegranate juice. The company claims that the Minute Maid drink deceived customers. The “Pomegranate-Blueberry Juice” was only .3 percent real pomegranate juice.

Along with their lawsuit, POM got to create some scorching advertising against the Minute Maid drink.

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: The NFL’s Grand Illusion is Null and Void, and Pats Fans Proved It

Nevertheless, as Newser reported, the jury found that Coca-Cola had done nothing wrong.

But this doesn’t mean that consumer protection laws are the answer. We have consumer protection laws already, and that did nothing to stop Coca-Cola. In fact, consumer protection laws do the opposite: as demonstrated in the video above by the lady who asks if what Coke is doing is even legal. Consumer protection laws give people a false sense of security. They assume they can trust the government will take care of them, when actually the government is often highly influenced or even controlled by corporations like Coca-Cola.

On the other hand, even though POM lost their court case, they spread knowledge about what Coca-Cola was doing. As a competing drink with more pomegranate, they had an incentive to educate consumers. Coca-Cola also made sure that consumers learned that POM uses concentrate.

In the resulting melee, consumers could make up their own minds.

The point here is that market forces and common law courts are more than adequate to provide a system that protects consumers. It doesn’t work perfectly, of course, but it is much better than authorizing a government agency to dictate quality standards.

Coca-Cola discontinued the drink in 2014. I suspect POM’s attack contributed to that outcome.

Joe Scudder

Joe Scudder is the "nom de plume" (or "nom de guerre") of a fifty-ish-year-old writer and stroke survivor. He lives in St Louis with his wife and still-at-home children. He has been a freelance writer and occasional political activist since the early nineties. He describes his politics as Tolkienesque.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.