san francsico

Could One West Coast City End Up Banning BEEF? Some Say YES!

In America, we are told that we are free to pursue happiness, just so long as that pursuit doesn’t do harm to anyone or their possessions.

It is this inalienable right to succeed that drives the entire American dream.  Without it, the hordes of young socialists would have dragged us down their wayward path decades ago.  No, the American people were never designed to fit into that system.  Not now.  Not ever.

And that’s the beautiful thing about freedom:  The line between having it and not having it is absolute.  You’re either free or you’re not.  That’s it.  Default to free.

In many an American city, however, something strange is happening.  Americans who all claim to love this liberty are attempting to subvert the freedoms enjoyed by their compatriots.  Whether it’s a Mauser or a mink coat, someone is coming for something that you own.

“San Francisco could become the largest U.S. city to ban the sale of fur, a move that would hearten animal lovers but frustrate niche business owners who say they are fed up with city officials dictating what retailers can or can’t sell.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Jim Acosta have gotten his press pass back?

  • Should Jim Acosta have gotten his press pass back?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Watch Obama Trash the USA 18 Different Times During His Recent Trip Abroad

“If the Board of Supervisors approves the ban Tuesday, San Francisco would join two other California cities — West Hollywood and Berkeley — in saying no to a glamour symbol that animal advocates say is built on cruelty and does not reflect the city’s values.

“San Francisco has a strong social conscience, often at a cost to businesses. Its board has banned the sale of menthol cigarettes and other flavored tobacco, which voters will consider in June, and prohibited performances by exotic animals. In 2016, San Francisco approved what was then a groundbreaking paid parental leave law, requiring private employers to offer six weeks of fully paid leave.

“If passed, the fur ban would go into effect Jan. 1 and apply to coats and anything else featuring real fur, including keychains and gloves.”

This isn’t a united sort of move here, San Francisco.  It does not reflect well on the togetherness of our nation.

Given the absurdity of the legal maneuver there has been plenty of interest in what could come next in San Francisco.  Will the city progress to the point of banning things such as gasoline-fueled cars?  Non-craft beers?  Beef?

“Skip Pas, chief executive officer of West Coast Leather, said fur items make up only a small portion of his inventory so he won’t be affected much.

“But he’s appalled that 11 people on a board can tell retailers what they can sell, without a vote by the public, and at a time when the city has more pressing issues, such as dirty streets and homelessness.

“‘It’s the people of San Francisco who should say, “Yes, it’s too much,”‘ he said. ‘What’s next? They’re going to say that you can’t have beef and you can’t have pork and duck in Chinatown? I mean, it’s a little too much.'”

Skip’s right, though.  It is too much.  This is a governmental overstep in the plainest of clothes.  Future generations will look back and laugh at the nonsensical nature of the social justice jackboots and their weaponizing of political correctness.

In fact, a great deal of the left’s rhetoric about the fur industry is just plain wrong.

“About half the furs produced in North America now come from farms, so no threat of extinction there. Furs taken from the wild, however, also come from abundant populations. Government-regulated trapping seasons ensure that we use only part of the surpluses produced each year in nature.

“Thanks to excellent national and international regulations, furbearing species that were once depleted in many areas have been restored. Biologists tell us that beavers in Canada are now as abundant as when Europeans first arrived in North America. Coyotes, foxes and raccoons are more abundant than they have ever been. This is a real environmental success story. “

This attention to detail distills all the way down the supply chain as well.
“Farmed mink and foxes are fed left-overs from our own food supply – the parts of chickens, pigs, fish and other animals that we don’t eat and might otherwise go into landfills. In addition to fur, farmed mink provide oil for cosmetics and the preservation of leather. Their manure, soiled straw bedding and carcasses are composted to produce organic fertilizers, to enrich the soil and produce more food, completing the agricultural nutrient cycle. Biofuels made from mink remains now power buses in Aarhus, Denmark, the world’s largest producer of farmed mink. Similar projects are being tested in North America. “
And, just for the bleeding heart liberals, the fur industry likes to point out that they are serious about the humane treatment of these animals.

“Of course there are other materials to keep us warm, but the best of them (wool, down, leather) also come from animals. Meanwhile, most synthetic fibers (including fake or ‘faux’ fur) are derived from petroleum, a non-renewable resource, the extraction and transformation of which entails serious environmental risks.

“In many regions, wildlife populations must be culled annually to maintain healthy and stable populations, to preserve habitat, to protect endangered species (e.g., by culling predators that attack ground-nesting birds or sea turtle eggs), and to safe-guard human health, livestock and property. If furbearer populations must be culled, surely it is more ethical to use these animals than to discard them?”

This makes fur an incredibly valuable resource – something that the twerps over at Peta will likely never admit.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.