Conservatives Fight for Real Change on Obamacare as GOP Moderates Worry

From the Daily Caller News Foundation:

Conservatives in the House are expressing concerns over language in a draft bill of the House Republicans’ plan to repeal and replace Obamacare.

Members of the Republican Study Committee (RSC) and the House Freedom Caucus (HFC) fear while rolling back former President Barack Obama’s landmark health care legislation, language in the blueprint is creating a new entitlement program.

“There are serious problems with what appears to be our current path to repeal and replace Obamacare. The draft legislation, which was leaked last week, risks continuing major Obamacare entitlement expansions and delays any reforms. It kicks the can down the road in the hope that a future Congress will have the political will and fiscal discipline to reduce spending that this Congress apparently lacks. Worse still,” RSC Chairman Mark Walker said in a statement.”The bill contains what increasingly appears to be a new health insurance entitlement with a Republican stamp on it.”

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Sean Hannity Promises to “ROCK” Midterms with McCaskill Video

Walker said he couldn’t vote for the legislation in its current form or recommend the bill to the members of the RSC.

HFC Chairman Mark Meadows said the tax credits in the draft legislation would increase from what was seen under Obamacare. The Affordable Care Act was only accessible to those who earned 400 times less than the poverty line, while the GOP blueprint provides subsides based on age, not income, effectively widening the scope of who receives funds, Slate reports.

“I mean there are a number of ways that we could probably figure out a way to fund health savings accounts without making it a reoccurring entitlement. But at the same time I think we’re going to have to all hopefully work together to come up with some policy initiatives that will do that,” Meadows told reporters Monday.

Meadows noted parts of the language included in the draft would not be applicable under the Bryd Rule, which allows senators to  block a piece of reconciliation legislation if it significantly increases the federal deficit beyond a decade.

I think there are a number of things in the draft that I have an issue with many of the things in the draft will not pass Byrd in the Senate anyways.” he said. “And so for us to suggest that this is a replacement plan knowing full well that many of the Byrd rules would preclude them from being included in the reconciliation instructions perhaps gives the false impression of what it can do and what it can’t do.”

A senior GOP noted tax credits have long been included in health reform plans “largely embraced by RSC and HFC including now Secretary Price’s plan that he introduced in the House.”

Tags

Constitution.com 🇺🇸

I am the supreme law of the United States. Originally comprising seven articles, I delineate the national frame of government. My first three articles entrench the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Articles Four, Five and Six entrench concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments and of the states in relationship to the federal government. Article Seven establishes the procedure subsequently used by the thirteen States to ratify it. I am regarded as the oldest written and codified constitution in force of the world.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.