CBS tells Democrat Leader to Watch His Mouth

CBS’ John Dickerson has always struck me as a person who holds propriety in the highest regard, and his recent commentary on DNC Chairman Tom Perez supports that line of thinking.

Perez is a well-known “potty-mouth” but his frequent  use of foul language tends to go unnoticed in the era of Donald Trump, who is no saint when it comes to his use of language either. Dickerson argues that two wrongs don’t make a right, and while the President may often use off-color commentary when speaking in public, it doesn’t mean that Perez should do it too.

In a recent bit of editorializing for his Sunday show Face the Nation Dickerson opined that everyone needs to step back and reconsider the language that they choose to use.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: O’Keefe Outs Another Deep State Dolt, This Time from IRS

The chairman of the Democratic National Committee, Tom Perez has been swearing a lot lately.

Gone is Michelle Obama’s advice for handling the opposition.

The best Democratic line of the last campaign, and words we should all live by. This is about more than crass language. In times of tension do you keep your standards or do you drop them?

The Washington Post asked Perez about his potty mouth and he pointed out correctly that Republicans have tolerated far worse from Donald Trump. So two wrongs make a right and the race is on to the bottom, or whatever is below the bottom.

At this point you may be swearing in rebuttal. Party chairmen are supposed to be extreme. This conveys urgency, it excites the crowd. Plus Donald Trump never paid a price. Essentially this is good politics.

Is it really? If you oppose a president for his coarseness, why would you imitate it? Donald Trump’s primary opponents tried and failed at this.

Also for a party with a message problem, there is something exhausting about the overuse of the manure-spreader. It suggests a reliance on shock rather than strength of an argument. The outburst is supposed to be spontaneous, but comes across as thoroughly calculated.

A pointed word now and again can be effective, as Bernie Sanders proved when he said… but it was the prior restraint, not just the word, that made people take notice.

Constitution.com 🇺🇸

I am the supreme law of the United States. Originally comprising seven articles, I delineate the national frame of government. My first three articles entrench the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Articles Four, Five and Six entrench concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments and of the states in relationship to the federal government. Article Seven establishes the procedure subsequently used by the thirteen States to ratify it. I am regarded as the oldest written and codified constitution in force of the world.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.