You Won’t Believe What Hillary Just Said About the Right to Bear Arms [VIDEO]

In an interview with George Stephanopoulos, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton shied away from stating whether the right to bear arms – guaranteed in the 2nd Amendment – is actually a Constitutional right.

ABC’s Stephanopoulos asked Clinton point-blank, “Do you believe that an individual’s right to bear arms is a constitutional right?”

The softball question appears tautological. In other words, Stephanopoulos is asking whether one of the rights guaranteed in the Constitution is a constitutional right. It’s redundant. It would be like asking whether the freedom of speech is a constitutional right. They’re both absurdly obvious questions.

But Hillary Clinton didn’t think the question was that obvious. A simple “yes” answer would have sufficed, but I imagine Clinton was anticipating some objections from her questioner, namely her voting record on the 2nd Amendment. So, she had to qualify her answer.

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Constitution updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Migrant Caravan Marches to Border, Invoking POTUS by Name

Here was her answer, in part:

“If it is a constitutional right, then it, like every other constitutional right, is subject to reasonable regulation. And what people have done with that (Heller) decision is to take it as far as they possibly can and reject what has been our history from the very beginning of the republic, where some of the earliest laws that were passed were about firearms.

“So I think it’s important to recognize that reasonable people can say, as I do, responsible gun owners have a right — I have no objection to that. But the rest of the American public has a right to require certain kinds of regularity, responsible actions to protect everyone else.”

The question then is what is “reasonable regulation?” It’s like when gun control proponents use the phrase “common sense gun reform.” What they mean by “reasonable” and “common sense” is actually unreasonable and lacking common sense.

Their legislative proposals amount to restricting everyone’s access to guns. But the only people who will actually abide by the rules are the law-abiding citizens. Criminals – by default – will disregard the laws. In fact, they will actually use gun control laws to their advantage to increase their victim count.

Please leave your comments below

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.