How to Slander Someone and Not Get in Trouble for It

This is a true horror story.

The justice system protects you from liars who would damage your reputation by telling lies about you. But now, as truth becomes relative, your rights are in jeopardy. Richard Simmons recently discovered this…

Suppose you are an upstanding member of the community. Your friends like you, and so do your family members. You attend church regularly. You get regular promotions at your job because you do good work. You have always done good work.

But then, one random day, a friend sends you a text message. The local paper has just published a story claiming you committed murder. There’s no trial. In response, you are fired from work because your employer doesn’t think it’s good business to employ murderers. Your church excommunicates you because murder is a violation of the basic Ten Commandments.

LIES, MORE LIES, AND SADISTICS

But the problem it, you never murdered anybody. Some old college buddy called the paper and fed them this story as a prank. Since the Internet is destroying their old-world revenue model, they were desperate enough to run the story without verifying the facts. They really need the publicity.

In response, you lost your job. You were excommunicated from your church. Your friends shunned you. Your life has been turned upside down. And you have no legal recourse because it’s not against the law for your friend to tell such an outrageous lie about you. Or for the paper to print it.

Now, thankfully, that’s not yet the world we live in. Murder is still considered a criminal charge that must be backed by proof.

But it could be getting closer. Richard Simmons just suffered an attack on his character that a judge has thrown out. The National Enquirer ran a story saying that Simmons was taking female hormones so that he could travel the same path Bruce Jenner did. Simmons sued.

Simmons sued the publications in May over a story alleging that he was in the process of becoming a woman. While affirming his support for trans people, Simmons has vehemently rejected the claim.

. . . .

At a hearing on Wednesday, Simmons’ attorneys argued that the court should confront the reality of the harms that transgender people face, rather than assume an ideal world where such harms do not exist.

“There are giant segments of society in this country who endorse the kind of prejudice and hatred and shunning of transgender persons in a way that is dramatically different than the way we treat race in this country,” argued attorney Rodney Smolla, on behalf of Simmons.

“The object of the National Enquirer was to do everything they could to humiliate this person,” added attorney Neville Johnson, also representing Simmons. “They made it up entirely out of whole cloth. I submit that when you make something up intentionally… and put it on the cover, there’s an inference you can make that somebody’s reputation is going to be harmed.”

Simmons argument was simple: the tabloid was trying to humiliate him by calling him a transgender. But the judge is throwing the argument out…

 

Read the Rest of the Story at GaryDeMar.com

Please leave your comments below