Abortion2

SCOTUS Ruling Proves Progressives Care NOTHING About Women’s Health and Safety

Just two weeks ago, the country mourned the deaths of 49 men and women senselessly massacred by an Islamic extremist. Progressive Liberals such as President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton immediately used the opportunity to push their agenda, once again spewing their mantra of, “If we can save just one life, gun control would be worth the cost.” The cost is not only our freedom with the irradiation of the Second Amendment, as history has shown us, it will also be millions of lives.

We begin this week with those same anti-gun activists cheering and praising the Supreme Court for ensuring women all over the country have the right to slaughter their unborn children. They didn’t care that the Texas bill was designed to put safety restrictions on abortion clinics, just as they claim their precious gun control would do to gun dealers. It is irrelevant the legislation was implemented to make sure the clinics were performing abortions with qualified doctors at properly equipped facilities.

The Liberal argument for keeping abortion legal has always been to guarantee safe and healthy abortions for women. The Texas bill would have closed clinics that did not meet appropriate safety and health standards. Today, pro-choicers celebrate the death of that bill. The Liberal agenda is fully exposed. It is not about health and safety for women. It is about the unrestricted mass murder of our unborn children.

Anti-gun advocates argue that the only purpose for guns is to kill. I would agree. That is the function of the gun. In that same regard, the only purpose for abortion is to massacre unborn babies. If pro-choice activists cared at all about the well-being of women, they should have been in full support of the Texas legislation. Instead, they hailed the SCOTUS ruling, which allows unqualified and unfit clinics to continue their butchering operations at the peril of the mother’s best health interests, as a major victory.

Many anti-gun, pro-choice advocates can rationalize their irrational logic by convincing themselves the killing of a fetus is acceptable as it’s not a human. It is just a collection of tissues there to hinder the life of the mother. Many Islamic extremists would say the same thing of the infidels they target for death. Anyone who does not bow to Allah is undeserving of life and must be eliminated so their god can return. They teach their children that Jews are nothing more than pigs that require being slaughtered and sacrificed to their god.

Mass murderers in general do not see their victims as humans. Creation, where we are all specific, purposeful products of God, has been replaced with evolution, where we are all random accidents. Our rejection of God and creationism has simultaneously drained our grasp of one’s life of having any merit. Bosses, co-workers, moviegoers, Christians, homosexuals, political adversaries, family members and even murderers themselves are not seen as invaluable individuals anymore. Human lives are meaningless and devoid of worth. There is no moral reason those lives cannot be irradiated at one’s whim as they are nothing more than accidents of nature anyway.

On the other hand, pro-choice advocates believe their so-called compassion for a pregnant woman well outweighs the life of the unborn baby. If that is the case, then they should be thanking Omar Mateen for murdering homosexuals. An Imam at his local mosque twists their meme as well, preaching it is compassionate to kill these sinful creators, as it is the only way to save them.  How can you hate Mateen for killing people he considered unwanted while at the same time cheering the ability to kill unwanted babies, all in the name of compassion?

Pro-gun, anti-abortion advocates are actually consistent in their beliefs. Both stances are pro-life positions. If a person enters an area with the intent to kill, I am a victim unless I have a means of defense, for me and everyone else in the vicinity. If I have a gun, I have a way to save lives. Maybe pro-choice advocates would rather we all carry scalpels instead, as they have no problem using that instrument to kill.

Evil is in the world whether I have a gun or not. If a person intends harm on others, he or she will find a way. Guns in the hands of good people can save the lives of many who may otherwise become helpless victims. That compassion and desire to preserve life starts at the moment of conception.

In the Bible, God warned His people again and again about following Moloch. Worshippers would sacrifice their live babies to this god with praise and eagerness. We are no better than these Godless heathens, demanding we rip our babies from our wombs while giving God the middle finger.

A person’s cries for gun control on the basis of preserving life are meaningless to me if they refuse to protect the most innocent of lives among us. This is not a day of rejoicing for America. This is a day of judgment. It never turned out well for Israel when she turned from the LORD and followed other gods. SCOTUS just confirmed our government worships Moloch. May God have mercy on us all.

But that’s just my two cents.

Tags

Pamela Adams

Pamela J. Adams maintains TheFactsPaper.com which includes her blog Liberating Letters. She is a stay-at-home mom who began researching history, science, religion, and current events to prepare for home schooling. She started Liberating Letters as short lessons for her daughter and publishes them for everyone’s benefit. Pamela has a Degree in Mathematics and was in the workforce for 20 years as a teacher, Marketing Director, Manager and Administrative Assistant. She has been researching her personal family history for over 24 years, publishing 3 books on her family’s genealogy. Follow her @PJA1791 & www.TheFactsPaper.com. You can find her books Here.

Please leave your comments below

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments