berkeleysnowflakes

Racists Run Wild at UC Berkeley

The racist little snowflakes at the University of California are back at it, demanding “safe spaces of color” for those who just can’t abide white people.

To make their point obvious — other than the one on top of their heads, that is — the little brats decided to disrupt the campus at UC Berkeley, beginning last Friday, by blocking a major foot bridge and only allowing non-whites to pass. White students and visitors were intimidated by the crowd and forced to walk down a gully, cross the stream, then climb back up the other side.

Later, the protesters went to harass people at a student store and the Student Union.

One female protester yelled through a loudspeaker, “Berkeley, why the f*** do you let UCPD do whatever they want with our bodies? I’m talking to you UCPD. I don’t give a f*** about you!”

So far, nobody has come forward with an explanation of what the hell she was talking about.

The YouTube video shows that when whites tried to cross Sather Gate bridge, the little darlings blocking the way would shout, “Go around! Go around!”

The spectacle supposedly had something to do with setting up “safe spaces” — leftist code for no-go zones for whites.

UC Berkeley, the campus that decades ago was famous for free speech, has turned a corner and is now one of several California campuses working to establish — or re-establish — segregated housing, classes and other facilities because the sensitive little urchins that go there won’t stop screaming, crying and wetting their pants until their “diversity” is protected from white people.

There was also some blah-de-blah about “safe spaces” for the gender-confused.

In fact, the students (assuming any of them actually attend classes) posted an “eviction notice” at the student store, about which the main complaint seems to have been that somebody in the crowd couldn’t afford one of the store’s sweaters.

I guess now the students expect the university to dress them. What’s next? Wiping their tushies?

The “eviction notice” read, in part, “If you fail to vacate immediately, community action will continue to escalate with the goal of eliminating any revenue generation. This space expansion is one step in an ongoing process to remedy the historical devaluation of students of color and LGBTQIA+ students.”

This obviously raises the very serious question, what the heck is “LGBTQIA+ students”? LGBT I get. Q I’m guessing is “queer,” which we’re allowed to say again. I haven’t the foggiest idea what “I” is supposed to be, and I don’t believe for a second that any of these punks are A-plus students.

Oh, and there’s the whole question about intimidating a business and trying to shut it down. That kind of bullying’s just not kosher.

But the main hook seems to have been the drive to check white privilege by a bunch of children — two-thirds of whom, statistically speaking, are probably privileged enough to have received taxpayer-funded grants for school expenses; none of whom, judging by their actions, have a lick of sense.

It’s good to see the ultraliberal university is maintaining its reputation of providing a quality, id-driven education, but it would be even better to see the school teach the mutant younglings a thing or two about manners and getting along in a civilized world.

Tags

Tad Cronn

Tad Cronn began his journalism career in 1983. While he earned awards for his work as a reporter and editor, his greatest joy is writing news commentary. Providing a conservative and often humorous outlook on current events, he now works as a freelance writer based in California.

Please leave your comments below

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments