Pro-abortion activists are again storming Washington D.C. as the Supreme Court hears arguments regarding a Texas law they consider too restrictive on abortion. It boggles my mind how desperately people will fight for the right to kill their own babies.
Most of the activists honestly think this is an argument about choice. They demand freedom in their reproductive lives. Hey, here’s a news flash. You already have it. But the choice is not to be made after the life is conceived, it is to be made before the reproductive act begins. But that is for another article.
To understand this crusade of death, simply look at the mother of the abortion movement, Margaret Sanger. Today’s liberal spin touts Sanger as a woman of strong convictions fighting for woman’s rights. She’s credited with educating the world on birth control and sex. I would like to continue that biography with actual facts, including her own words.
Sanger lived in Greenwich Village with her husband, William, where she rubbed elbows with New York elites like Socialist/Democrat Upton Sinclair and anarchist Emma Goldman. Sanger was a member of groups like the Women’s Committee of the New York Socialist Party and the Liberal Club.
After finding herself in legal trouble, she fled to Europe where she had affairs with eugenics supporter Havelock Ellis and socialist H.G. Wells. While there, her progressive lovers and friends taught her how to use the compassion of family planning as a guise to persuade people to their cause. See, their objective wasn’t birth control to help the burdened family. It was to force their progressive ideology on society and wipe out those who were inferior, which was basically Blacks and other non-Whites, the physically and mentally inadequate, the physically and mentally handicap, and the poor.
Upon her return to the states, Sanger rolled up her sleeves and got right to work in pushing her doctrine of the perfect race. In a 1915 handbook targeting teenagers, she wrote, “Stop bringing to birth children whose inheritance cannot be one of health or intelligence.” Does that sound like compassionate family planning or choice to you?
In fact, she was so for a woman’s right to choose she wrote the following in “Plan for Peace” from Birth Control Review (April 1932, pp. 107-108):
-The first step would thus be to control the intake and output of morons, mental defectives, epileptics.
-The second step would be to take an inventory of the secondary group such as illiterates, paupers, unemployables, criminals, prostitutes, dope-fiends; classify them in special departments under government medical protection, and segregate them on farms and open spaces as long as necessary for the strengthening and development of moral conduct.
-Having corralled this enormous part of our population and placed it on a basis of health instead of punishment, it is safe to say that fifteen or twenty millions of our population would then be organized into soldiers of defense— defending the unborn against their own disabilities
In an article for American Weekly, Sanger provided the following insight in: “America Needs a Code for Babies,” 27 Mar 1934.
Article 1. The purpose of the American Baby Code shall be to provide for a better distribution of babies… and to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit.
Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit…
Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.
So who is the “unfit” in Article 1? According to Sanger, “Non-Aryan people [of the United States are] a great biological menace to the future of civilization.” Blacks she characterized as “human weeds”. In fact, this is so paramount to Sanger’s own brainchild, Planned Parenthood, that 79% of their abortion clinics target Black and Hispanic neighborhoods. If Planned Parenthood is about choice, why are they so focused on killing minorities?
In 2012, New York City aborted more Black babies than were actually born. In fact, abortions to Black mothers made up 42.4% of the babies killed while Hispanics comprised another 31%. Together 73% of New York City’s abortions were of these two minority groups alone. Congratulations Margaret Sanger and pro-choice advocates.
Articles 4 and 6 have nothing to do with choice. They are the antithesis of it. Proposing no woman has a “legal right to bear a child,” sounds more like enslavement than reproductive freedom. Demanding a “permit for parenthood” is anything but personal choice. It is a superiority dogma professed by progressive elitists who claim understanding and kindness to the very population they wish to terminate.
We all gasp at and repudiate the horrific actions of the Nazi’s against the Jews, but guess where they learned it from. Good old, Margaret Sanger and her eugenics friends right here in America. In fact, between 1907 and 1963, over 60,000 people were involuntarily sterilized in the United States under American law. Choice? I think not.
The movement of sterilization and segregation was not as popular as Sanger had hoped, especially after World War II. She had to find another way to rid the earth of the “unfit.” She had to convince the mothers to voluntarily terminate their own babies. Enter abortion.
Sanger was so invested in reducing, if not irradiating, the Black population, she found friends and allies in the KKK and other similar groups. She even enlisted Blacks themselves. In a letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, an heir of Proctor and Gamble, Sanger wrote the following:
“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”
So while you pro-choice people rally for your right to kill your offspring, know the woman who started it all did so because she thought you were stupid, unfit, diseased, inferior, and quite frankly, not good enough to reproduce. Sure, she did it under the guise of giving you the illusion of freedom in controlling how many children you have, but make no mistake, she did whatever she had to so you would proudly kill your own baby. It didn’t matter to her why you did it. She was only concerned about making sure you did do it.
There is nothing more diseased than a society that celebrates the execution of their own children. After seeing the undercover videos of Planned Parenthood selling aborted babies like a stolen car disassembled for parts, how can anyone still argue Planned Parenthood is a company worth supporting? It is morally equivalent to saying, “Nazis may have killed 6 million Jews, but they built the autobahn.” I, for one, think it is about time to abort, disassemble, and sell off Margaret Sanger’s most precious baby.
But that’s just my 2 cents.