On the same day that President Obama says that Russia is “not” on our side, Secretary of State John Kerry told MSNBC that if it wasn’t for Russia (and even worse, Iran), Syria would have already fallen to Muslim extremists!
MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell tries to tee up a softball for Kerry to beat up on Russia and Vladimir Putin, but instead Kerry perfectly explains why we should have done our best to work with Russia and Syria on the problems there, instead of siding with Muslim rebels (most of whom were also tied to Al Qaeda or ISIS):
Andrea Mitchell: Five years. So many people dead. Displaced millions. The suffering. Russia, the game-changer, a year and some months ago entering with no warning, 24 hours after meeting personally with President Obama, Putin’s planes are flying over Syria for the first time. No warning at all to us. The Russian role has been so devastating in propping up Assad at a critical juncture. Any regrets? You expressed some that were in an overheard audio to some of the opposition leaders. Any regrets that we didn’t arm the rebels sooner, when there might have been a better opportunity?
John Kerry: Well again, Andrea, I’m going to have a lot of opportunities to be able to look back and digest what choices might have been made. I’m not going to do it now… Except to say to you, very clearly, that I’m proud of all the efforts we made to try to lead people to a peaceful resolution. And in fact, the only solution to Syria will be a peaceful agreement along the lines of what we laid out… and the several communiques that we issued, and the United Nations resolution that we passed. 2254. Those will be the basis for whatever happens, if they get there.
I believe there is an exhaustion setting in, sometimes timing is everything in these kinds of negotiations. And I believe that there is a possibility over the course of the next year that the parties could come forward. It would be on a different plane of leverage, a different kind of outcome than some people might have anticipated. But there may be possibilities of trying to move forward…
There is no military solution to the problem of Syria. When President Putin came in, he came in partly to prop up Assad, but also because ISIL/Da’esh was gaining huge ground. The radical extremists were gaining huge ground against Assad, and Assad was in a very fragile position. And so together, Iran and Russia had to prop him up, and save him from the possibilities that the extremists might take over the country.
And I will say, that was not something that we weren’t also concerned about — that there was a gaining foothold of al-Nusra, and Da’esh, in their ability to push towards Damascus. And the regime was on its heels. Did Putin make an enormous difference in that? Yes, along with Iran and Hezbollah and the entities that basically overwhelmed some of the forces available to the opposition. But that doesn’t end the war. Nothing that he has done is in fact going to obviate the need to get to Geneva to have… a real negotiation that resolves the political differences [in Syria]…
That’s a hard road to get to, no matter what Putin has done.
Vladimir Putin is bad. Bashar al Assad is evil. Both men are despots who have sorely mistreated their people, and both men deserve to be overthrown and discarded in the wastebin of history. BUT, neither man is “more” evil than the villains who support Muslim “extremism.” Assad is bad, ISIS is worse. Our efforts against Assad made the rise of ISIS possible; instead we should have found a way to work with Putin to minimize the death and destruction and avoid the rise of ISIS altogether.
The Syrian problem perfectly encapsulates the constant string of foreign policy failures perpetrated on our planet by the Obama administration. The Obama team has no foreign policy achievements to speak of, only a series of ever worsening catastrophes.