Constitutional Requirement to Shut Down Mosques as Hate Groups

Obama’s former White House Homeland Security advisor, Mohamed Elibiary (a Muslim Brotherhood member), asserted:

“America is an Islamic country” with an “Islamic Compliant Constitution.”

Elbiary, like most Islamists, believes America will soon be part of a Muslim majority world.

To understand him, Obama, and many other Islamists, it’s important to first understand that Islam is not a religion. “Religious worship” is only one aspect of an expansive Islamic political ideology.

Islam regulates financial transactions and contracts, morality, philosophical beliefs, and criminal and civil law. Islamic Shari’a Councils exist in societies worldwide, which institutionalize and regulate violence against women, honor killings, child marriage, and domestic violence.

Islamic rules are outlined in the Qur’an by Muhammad, a self-proclaimed prophet and political leader, about which he explicitly stated no follower of his could alter or ignore. While Islam, literally translated, means “submission” [to Allah—or death], Islam and Shari’a law are one and the same.

Islam’s totalitarian political ideology specifies a mandatory legal system to oversee all areas of society—and rejects every aspect of western law.

  • Drinkers of alcohol, gamblers, and unmarried sexual partners must be whipped;
  • All gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and transgender people are to be executed if sever punishment does not result in repentance and halting of perverted behavior.
  • Free speech, freedom of the press, and freedom to worship or not worship do not exist under Islamic law.

In fact, the Qur’an, the Hadith, and the Sunnah all clearly articulate Islam’s ultimate goal: to implement worldwide totalitarian rule under Shari’a Law.

Several efforts are underway in America towards this end.

The Muslim Brotherhood recently announced its intention to create a political party to engage Muslims in U.S. politics in addition to the numerous organizations and agencies it has infiltrated over the last several decades. CAIR (the Council on American Islamic Relations) and other organizations and Islamists are actively trying to make every state constitution Shari’a compliant.

Obama’s close friend, Omar Ahmed, Chairman of the Board of CAIR claimed:

“Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Qur’an should be the highest authority in America.”

Belgian leader Abu Imran helps clarify the Islamic perspective:

“Democracy is the opposite of Islam. A Muslim who supports democracy is equivalent to a Jewish Muslim. It’s impossible to be both Jewish and Muslim and impossible to be a Muslim against Shari’a.”

It is an Islamist’s duty to transform all governments to Shari’a Law– which is why mosques act primarily as political centers, not “religious” institutions.

According to the Center for Security Policy, 81 percent of all mosques in America distribute imam-promoted literature that encourages violence as part of advancing Islam. According to the Center’s survey results, data, and calculations, the majority of men who attend mosques on a weekly basis attend mosques that promote jihad.

Because the imam-distributed material classifies as hate speech, many Islamic organizations affiliated with and/or funding/managing mosques can be classified as “hate groups.” More importantly, they can also be shut down.

The Qur’an is the only “religious book” that requires its followers to target and kill certain people— solely based on their ethnicity and religious belief and/or affiliation.

Even if considered “religious,” no rational assertion can claim Islam does not incite violence. Because violence is integral to Islam, Islam itself violates the U.S. Constitution.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled more than once that “hate speech,” which incites violence, falls outside of constitutional protection.

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. argued, “The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic.” (Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47, 39 S. Ct. 247, 63 L. Ed. 470 [1919]).

In 1969 the Supreme Court added three conditions to the Holmes argument for restricting speech; the speech in question must have 1) the intent and 2) the likelihood of causing 3) imminent violence.

Inciting the intent to kill any non-Muslim, anyone who rejects the Qur’an, Shari’a law and Islam, involving direct encouragements for others to commit crimes and to commit them “now,” all meet the three-prong criteria. Yet, few if any legal actions have been taken against imams, mosques, or any other groups continuing to incite violence.

Every American citizen must demand that legal action be taken to curtail and halt incitement to violence being directed towards any and everyone who rejects Islam. The first place to start is by first classifying mosques as “hate groups.” Next, shut down mosques. Finally, identify, arrest, and try imams and everyone who poses a direct threat to the Constitution, as instructed in Article III.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tags

Bethany Blankley

Bethany Blankley is the Senior Editor for Constitution.com. Her syndicated show, "America's Betrayal," can be heard on Conservative Review Radio, WAAR Radio, and other talk radio stations. Her columns have been published by The Washington Times, Newsday, Western Journalism, Townhall, The Christian Post, Charisma News, and others. She was a former communications strategist to four Senators, one Congressman, one New York governor, and several nonprofits. She holds graduate and undergraduate degrees in Theology and Political Science. Follow her: @bethanyblankley & www.bethanyblankley.com.

We invite you to leave your comments below

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments