Billionaire Peter Thiel, who was an early investor in Facebook and co-founded PayPal, spoke at the Republican National Convention at the invitation of Donald Trump. Thiel said that he was proud to be “gay.” I don’t understand the relationship between the word “gay” and having sex with someone of the same sex. I guess that’s the point.
When Thiel says he’s “gay,” he is not really stating what he is. He’s covering for what he does sexually. Peter Thiel has sex with other men, and this, he tells us, makes him “gay,” and for this he’s “proud.” I don’t get it. He’s proud because of his choice of sexual partners? Who else says this kind of thing?
I guess there may be adulterers who are proud, but I haven’t seen Adultery Pride Parades.
Now we have same-sex marriages recognized by the Supreme Court, and any person who does not recognize the unproductive union can suffer severe financial and social consequences. How does “pride” in anything lead to legal harassment for anyone who does not recognize what a person is proud of being or doing?
Those who oppose same-sex sexuality warned that pride would lead to tyranny, and it has. Furthermore, normalizing same-sex sexuality would lead to the normalizing of all things sexual.
A number of women want to marry their dogs and receive the same legal protections as people who marry people of the same sex. A Kentucky woman wants to marry an animal. She is suing the state because she was denied a license to marry an animal. Her 56-page lawsuit maintains that “marriage to an animal wouldn’t be that different than same-sex marriage.” (Source)
Given that evolution is the operating scientific and legal sanctioned explanation for origins (try teaching any other view in a government school), the logic of this woman’s lawsuit is valid. According to evolutionists, humans are “domesticated human animals,” if human animals can marry one another, then why can’t all animals marry one another?
Of course, animals don’t marry. Marriage is a God-ordained institution. God designed men and women to be anatomically (biologically) compatible. Peter Thiel’s sexual relations with other men will never result in any offspring. It’s a dead-end.
Not to be outdone, Mark “Chris” Sevier has filed a federal lawsuit against Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis in Kentucky “for denying a man a license to marry his laptop computer.” It sounds ridiculous until you realize that human animals are nothing more than matter in motion. We’re made from the same stuff as computers. As Joni Mitchell’s song “Woodstock” says, “We are star dust, Billion-year-old carbon.” So why can’t one kind of carbon marry another type of carbon?
Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel, said, “When you make gender irrelevant to a gender-based relationship you open Pandora’s Box and make a mockery out of marriage.” (Source)
Given the logic of it all, and Peter Thiel’s pride in the performance of a particular sex choice, the day may come when the animal and computer “gays” will stand up at a national political convention and declare their pride in their sexual choices.