The Security Service of the Reichsführer-SS (SD) was the first intelligence agency of Nazi Germany.

And so it Begins, Being Anti-Nazi is now “Hate Speech”

The Security Service of the Reichsführer-SS (SD) was the first intelligence agency of Nazi Germany.

Amidst holiday bustle, prior to going on recess, and with little to no media coverage, House Democrats introduced a resolution on December 17, 2015 in direct violation of the First Amendment and in compliance with Shari’a law.

The non-binding, but symbolic House Resolution 569, “condemns violence, bigotry, and hateful rhetoric towards Muslims in the United States.”

Because Islam is a political ideology, not a race or religion, its intolerance of those who disagree with or oppose Shari’a law, is no different than the totalitarian ideologies of fascism, socialism, or Nazism.

In essence, those supporting the resolution are condemning a person from criticizing the Nazi Party, as a hate crime, which by the way, is exactly what Hitler did.

Robert Spencer of FrontPage Magazine explains, “what H. Res. 569 does is conflate violence — attacks on innocent civilians, which have no justification under any circumstances – with ‘bigotry’ and ‘hateful rhetoric,’ which are identified on the basis of subjective judgments.”

House Democrats’ efforts coincide with Loretta Lynch’s earlier unconstitutional effort to form “a global law enforcement initiative,” known as “The Strong Cities Network” (SCN). SCN’s stated goal appears to combat “violent extremism,” how it identifies and defines “extremism” and– what acts it seeks to criminalize– is critical to recognizing SCN as a genuine national security threat.

House Democrats’ efforts appear to replicate the Canadian City of Quebec’s recent motion condemning “Islamaphobia,” which specifically and solely prohibits speech about Islam and Muslims– not any other group or ideology.

House Democrats also appear no different than Saudi Iyad Madani, secretary-general of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), who recently recently expressed
“Freedom of expression as a way to offend religions and their symbols, is totally unacceptable.”

Loretta Lynch, the SCN, and House Democrats supporting H. Res. 569 are all implementing Shari’a compliance via “lawfare.” Initially, these laws impose limits on free speech and expression. Eventually, they make illegal freedom of speech, and the right to protest or disagree, all protected by the U.S. Constitution. Ultimately, they evolve into Shari’a Blasphemy and Apostasy Laws.

Ironically, no such resolution has been passed to protect Jews or Christians from “violence, bigotry, and hateful rhetoric” — especially during a year when Christians are the most persecuted group worldwide — and Jews continue to be the #1 victim of hate crimes in America, including on college campuses.

And, instead of addressing the real issue of Islamists targeting and killing non-Muslims, these members continue to commit treasonous acts by enabling and financing known enemies of America, who by their own admission hate America.

Two questions remain: Why are these people still in office? And why have they not been impeached?

Tags

Bethany Blankley

Bethany Blankley is a political analyst for Fox News Radio and has appeared on television and radio programs nationwide. She writes about political, cultural, and religious issues in America from the perspective of an evangelical and former communications staffer. She was a communications strategist for four U.S. Senators, one U.S. Congressman, a former New York governor, and several non-profits. She earned her MA in Theology from The University of Edinburgh, Scotland and her BA in Political Science from the University of Maryland. Follow her @bethanyblankley facebook.com/BlankleyBethany/ & BethanyBlankley.com.

Please leave your comments below

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments